2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-012-9609-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance and importance of clinical pharmacists’ LIMM-based recommendations

Abstract: This study provides further evidence of the quality of the LIMM model and confirms that the inclusion of clinical pharmacists in a multi-professional team can improve drug therapy for inpatients. The very high level of acceptance by the physicians of the pharmacists' recommendations further demonstrates the effectiveness of the process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
29
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drug-related problems found, % (95 % CI) 31 (29)(30)(31)(32)(33) Interventions, n (%) 537 (31) Acceptance rate for Interventions…”
Section: Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Drug-related problems found, % (95 % CI) 31 (29)(30)(31)(32)(33) Interventions, n (%) 537 (31) Acceptance rate for Interventions…”
Section: Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How interventions are communicated between pharmacists and physicians highly affect acceptance rates, and face-to-face communication has been recognised to be an important factor leading to the highest acceptance rate [29][30][31]. However, this form of communication can be difficult in acute wards with a high-paced workflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This LIMM-DI is given to the patient and sent to their primary care representative. The LIMM model, which has been investigated in four PhD theses and 14 studies, improves the appropriateness of medications, reduces the number of transmission errors and halves the number of medication-related contacts with healthcare professionals 510. The pharmacist's role and actions are seen as important 6 10…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors were not assessed for their harm and severity. In a previous study,20 we have assessed clinical consequences of the discrepancies using the same methods as in this study; 83% of the discrepancies were ranked 3 (somewhat significant) or higher and almost half (49%) were ranked 4 (significant) or higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%