1995
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00049-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptable quality level versus zero-defects: some empirical evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Narasimhan et al (1993) examine the dynamic influence of price and perceived quality on sales, and investigate the effect of continuous quality improvements on optimal pricing Narasimhan et al (1996). Love et al (1995) perform an empirical study using a dynamic model and find that the short run quality control problem is consistent with the optimal quality view whereas the long-run quality control problem is consistent with the total quality view. Burgess (1996) examines quality costs models in the literature and tests the dynamics of quality costs and quality level utilizing a simulation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Narasimhan et al (1993) examine the dynamic influence of price and perceived quality on sales, and investigate the effect of continuous quality improvements on optimal pricing Narasimhan et al (1996). Love et al (1995) perform an empirical study using a dynamic model and find that the short run quality control problem is consistent with the optimal quality view whereas the long-run quality control problem is consistent with the total quality view. Burgess (1996) examines quality costs models in the literature and tests the dynamics of quality costs and quality level utilizing a simulation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging in the literature is a balanced view of quality costs that does not contradict the core premise of either the optimal quality or the total quality (Love et al, 1995;Burgess, 1996;Lorente and Rodriguez, 1998;Visawan and Tannock, 2004). This paper is motivated by these studies attempting to further examine the relationships between quality costs and quality level utilizing an analytical methodology built on the findings in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the best know is from Juran, his view proposed that the balance of quality is found when the company is able to set the cost of conformance for quality parallel to a standard offset by the cost of non-conformance (Love, 1995).…”
Section: Data Quality Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Love [51]costs of Non-Conformities (NC) are typically broken down into two areas: (i) cost of internal failures (scrap, rework and other excesses before the product is shipped) and, (ii) cost of external failures (warranty services, costs of product failures during its use). While in conformity costs we may also include those ones relative to fault prevention, within NC costs are encompassed all the direct and indirect costs of faults [52].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%