2002
DOI: 10.1080/0958159021000029540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptable and appropriate: Program priorities vs. felt needs in a CHW program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In approximately 13 studies, from Australia (Downie 2004), Canada (Heaman 2006;, UK (Murphy 2008;Perkins 2001;Smith 2007), USA (Sheppard 2004;Warrick 1992), Brazil (Wayland 2002), Mexico (Ramirez-Valles 2003), India (Alcock 2009), Papua New Guinea (Ashwell 2009) and Viet Nam (Hendrickson 2002), LHWs carried out a package of tasks that were primarily promotional, and mainly involved information and advice about topics such as family planning, pregnancy and childbirth, breastfeeding, vaccinations and other aspects of newborn and child health care.…”
Section: Promotion Counselling and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In approximately 13 studies, from Australia (Downie 2004), Canada (Heaman 2006;, UK (Murphy 2008;Perkins 2001;Smith 2007), USA (Sheppard 2004;Warrick 1992), Brazil (Wayland 2002), Mexico (Ramirez-Valles 2003), India (Alcock 2009), Papua New Guinea (Ashwell 2009) and Viet Nam (Hendrickson 2002), LHWs carried out a package of tasks that were primarily promotional, and mainly involved information and advice about topics such as family planning, pregnancy and childbirth, breastfeeding, vaccinations and other aspects of newborn and child health care.…”
Section: Promotion Counselling and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recipients in most of the studies indicated a high level of acceptability with the LHW programmes, some studies also described less positive attitudes. In some studies the target groups had poor knowledge of the LHW programme itself or were not fully aware of the services that the programme could o er (Bisika 2008;Kaufmann 1997;Mathews 1994;Murphy 2008;Wayland 2002). In one study recipients were aware of the existence of trained traditional birth attendants but were mostly unable to utilize them because they could not a ord their services (Ngoma 2009).…”
Section: Lack Of Knowledge User Fees or Concerns About Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A Namibian study found when the project aims and expectations of the residents were incongruent, LHWs became frustrated and as a result performed poorly (Wayland, 2002). Developing clear objectives for LHW programmes as well as detailed planning of the implementation strategy are vital (Low and Ithindi, 2003).…”
Section: Lhw Programmes: Some Lessonsmentioning
confidence: 99%