2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1022795414070060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of using Karachay surnames as a quasigenetic marker in population and genetic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the use of molecular marker, in the present study and in particular, genetic distance estimates were instrumental in the identification and selection of parents that maximized yield and fruit indicators and capitalized on heterosis as basis/reference to selection of hybrid parents as clearly illustrated in the present study. Finally, it is also noteworthy to state that the unsuccessful 56-2×41-4 mating (i.e., lack of progeny production) has been previously reported (Uggla and Carlson-Nilsson 2005;Vander Mijnsbrugge 2015;El'chinova et al 2014) and maybe hints to the presence of incompatibility mechanisms between these two parents.…”
Section: Yield and Fruit Indicators Relationship With Genetic Distancmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Through the use of molecular marker, in the present study and in particular, genetic distance estimates were instrumental in the identification and selection of parents that maximized yield and fruit indicators and capitalized on heterosis as basis/reference to selection of hybrid parents as clearly illustrated in the present study. Finally, it is also noteworthy to state that the unsuccessful 56-2×41-4 mating (i.e., lack of progeny production) has been previously reported (Uggla and Carlson-Nilsson 2005;Vander Mijnsbrugge 2015;El'chinova et al 2014) and maybe hints to the presence of incompatibility mechanisms between these two parents.…”
Section: Yield and Fruit Indicators Relationship With Genetic Distancmentioning
confidence: 80%