2019
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1622643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Benin: a qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, since none of the construct used to measure facilitators and barrier to PrEP use included more than one item, the assessment of internal consistency was not applicable. Nearly all the variables described below were extracted from the literature on PrEP acceptability among MSM [22][23][24], with some variables coming from the qualitative study conducted beforehand [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, since none of the construct used to measure facilitators and barrier to PrEP use included more than one item, the assessment of internal consistency was not applicable. Nearly all the variables described below were extracted from the literature on PrEP acceptability among MSM [22][23][24], with some variables coming from the qualitative study conducted beforehand [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was designed in conjunction with literature data and the results of a preliminary qualitative study on PrEP acceptability among MSM in Benin [21]. The qualitative study served as a springboard to contextualize the quantitative questionnaire used for the present study.…”
Section: Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the dependent variable was dichotomized: level 5 (high PrEP acceptability) versus levels 1-4 (no high PrEP acceptability). The set of independent variables scrutinized was based on results of the qualitative component of this study and on a literature review on general concerns about PrEP uptake in sub-Saharan Africa (Ahouada et al, 2019;Molina et al, 2015;Mugo et al, 2016;Pelletier et al, 2019;Rocha et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2013). It included, but was not limited to, sociodemographic characteristics (age, education and occupation), the social network (number of MSM known in Bouaké and elsewhere in the country), risk taking and risk compensation behavior (condom use, number of partners and alcohol consumption), sexual role (being active, passive or versatile), PrEP knowledge, facilitators, and barriers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a massive loss in terms of the health and the economy of the country concerned (Ajayi, Adeniyi, & Akpan, 2018). There are certain factors that have been found to be major drivers of HIV in Namibia, namely, multiple and concurrent sexual partners, intergenerational sex and unprotected sexual intercourse (Ahouada et al, 2020). Additionally, (Ahouda et al, 2020) reported that alcohol abuse, lack of protection during sex and high population mobility are other factors that contribute to the high incidence of HIV in Namibia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%