2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05940-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of point-of-care viral load testing to facilitate differentiated care: a qualitative assessment of people living with HIV and nurses in South Africa

Abstract: Background Providing viral load (VL) results to people living with HIV (PLHIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains a challenge in low and middle-income countries. Point-of-care (POC) VL testing could improve ART monitoring and the quality and efficiency of differentiated models of HIV care. We assessed the acceptability of POC VL testing within a differentiated care model that involved task-shifting from professional nurses to less highly-trained enrolled nurses, and an option of collecting treatment from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This qualitative evaluation privileges the voices of implementers. Implementer voices have been represented in a few other studies focusing on POC VL testing, usually to report perceived benefits and challenges, and/or suggestions for how testing can be improved [23][24][25]. In this study, we asked implementers to describe how they carried out testing activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This qualitative evaluation privileges the voices of implementers. Implementer voices have been represented in a few other studies focusing on POC VL testing, usually to report perceived benefits and challenges, and/or suggestions for how testing can be improved [23][24][25]. In this study, we asked implementers to describe how they carried out testing activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…medical/non-medical or specialized/non-specialized) plus the absence of continuum training cause lack of confidence in the POCT and the results [ 41 , 42 ]. Nevertheless, common facilitators were identified, such as: HCP enthusiasm to obtain same-day results [ 43 ], reduce re-consultations [ 14 , 40 ] and save patient’ travel expenses [ 44 ], the test influence patient-HCP interaction [ 45 , 46 ], and the non-requirement of specialized skills to operate the devices [ 47 ]. Future implementation of POCT for both infectious diseases and NCDs should learn from the facilitators and barriers previously identified when designing the components of the intervention in order to find ways to take advantage of facilitators and/or overcome barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few qualitative studies have assessed acceptability of POC VL testing among adults living with HIV. Two qualitative studies, one from South Africa [ 19 ] and another from Kenya [ 12 ], interviewed clients and providers who noted clear practical benefits of implementing POC VL testing, namely, faster turnaround times, fewer clinical encounters, and reduced burden on clients and providers. POC VL testing among PWLHIV has been found to significantly increase ART initiation in pregnancy and reduce the risk of vertical HIV transmission [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%