Acceptability of mobile-phone reminders for routine childhood vaccination appointments in Nigeria – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Mobile-phone reminders have gained traction among policymakers as a way to improve childhood vaccination coverage and timeliness. However, there is limited evidence on the acceptability of mobile-phone reminders among patients and caregivers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the ownership of mobile-phone device and the willingness to receive mobile-phone reminders among mothers/caregivers utilizing routine childhood immunization services in Nigeria. Method MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, CNKI, AJOL (African Journal Online), and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies on the acceptability of mobile-phone reminders for routine immunization appointments among mothers/caregivers in Nigeria. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and JBI critical appraisal checklists. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects model to generate pooled estimates (proportion) of mothers who owned at least one mobile phone and proportion of mothers willing to receive mobile-phone reminders. Results Sixteen studies (13 cross-sectional and three interventional) involving a total of 9923 mothers across 15 states and the Federal Capital Territory Abuja met inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates showed that the proportion of mothers who owned at least one mobile phone was 96.4% (95% CI = 94.1–98.2%; I2 = 96.3%) while the proportion of mothers willing to receive mobile-phone reminders was 86.0% (95% CI = 79.8–91.3%, I2 = 98.4%). Most mothers preferred to receive text message reminders at least 24 h before the routine immunization appointment day, and in the morning hours. Approximately 52.8% of the mothers preferred to receive reminders in English, the country’s official language. Conclusion Current evidence suggests a high acceptability for mobile-phone reminder interventions to improve routine childhood immunization coverage and timeliness. Further studies, however, are needed to better understand unique regional preferences and assess the operational costs, long-term effects, and risks of this intervention. Systematic review protocol registration PROSPERO CRD42021234183.

COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy in health and care workers and the general population: a systematic review and policy recommendations

“…On this point, the only progress was in understanding the regulatory mechanisms and public policies that countries used to increase COVID-19 vaccination coverage. According to a recent systematic review and metaanalysis (32), reminders via mobile phones on interventions to improve coverage and timeliness of routine childhood vaccination enjoyed wide acceptance, thus providing a technological approach that can be used to increase COVID-19 vaccination in the general population.…”

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing educational and reminder digital interventions for promoting HPV vaccination uptake

“…For clients, these interventions can furnish education about the importance of vaccination 26 and dispel prevalent myths 27 . They can also send reminders and alerts for upcoming vaccination appointments 17 , track vaccination records, and facilitate the easy scheduling of vaccination appointments 28 , 29 . For healthcare providers, digital tools not only support in delivering vaccination services but also provide education through websites or webinars 30 .…”