Acceptability and Feasibility of a Return-to-Work Intervention for Posttreatment Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Co-design and Development Study

Abstract

Background The mortality rate from breast cancer has been declining for many years, and the population size of working-age survivors is steadily increasing. However, the recurrent side effects of cancer and its treatment can result in multiple disabilities and disruptions to day-to-day life, including work disruptions. Despite the existing knowledge of best practices regarding return to work (RTW) for breast cancer survivors, only a few interdisciplinary interventions have been developed to address the individualized needs and multiple challenges of breast cancer survivors, health care professionals, and employer and insurer representatives. Thus, it seems appropriate to develop RTW interventions collaboratively by using a co-design approach with these specific stakeholders. Objective This paper presents a protocol for developing and testing an innovative, interdisciplinary pilot intervention based on a co-design approach to better support RTW and job retention after breast cancer treatment. Methods First, a participatory research approach will be used to develop the intervention in a co-design workshop with 12 to 20 participants, including people affected by cancer, employer and insurer representatives, and health care professionals. Next, a pilot intervention will be tested in a primary care setting with 6 to 8 women affected by breast cancer. The acceptability and feasibility of the pilot intervention will be pretested through semistructured interviews with participants, health care professionals, and involved patient partners. The transcribed data will undergo an iterative content analysis. Results The first phase of the project—the co-design workshop—was completed in June 2021. The pilot test of the intervention will begin in spring 2022. The results from the test will be available in late 2022. Conclusions The project will offer novel data regarding the use of the co-design approach for the development of innovative, co-designed interventions. In addition, it will be possible to document the acceptability and feasibility of the pilot intervention with a primary care team. Depending on the results obtained, the intervention could be implemented on a larger scale. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/37009

Co-design of the Transgender Health Information Resource: Web-Based Participatory Design

“…A web-based design approach required adapting in-person participatory design approaches to understand the targeted end users, the tasks end users were attempting to complete, and the environment in which participants completed the tasks [ 59 ]. The three stages of the TGHIR participatory design approach were adapted from Spinuzzi [ 65 ] and included (1) initial exploration of end-user needs, (2) discovery processes of prioritization and ideation on potential outcomes, and (3) prototyping.…”

“…Participatory design has been used by other research teams to support the design of health information resources [ 54 - 59 ]. This project was potentially the first to engage TGD participants exclusively in a web-based participatory design process.…”

Development of a Cancer Pathway Support Guide for Patients and Carers: A Codesign Project

“…Tere are a limited number of research studies using the TFA questionnaire to address the acceptability of patientfacing interventions in cancer research and they have yet to test its usefulness to be able to provide an interpretation of our results using this questionnaire [20,22]. TFA has also been used in a variety of research as a theoretical framework guiding research design such as assessing the acceptability of interventions for improving cancer screening uptake [23] and digital patient decision-making and support tools postdiagnosis [24] using qualitative approaches. Te mixedmethod and theory-based approach to codesign in cancer research is still in its infancy, and we need more research providing detailed methods for researchers and healthcare service providers to develop robust evidence and recommendations, limitations, implications, and next steps.…”

Return‐to‐work self‐efficacy questionnaire: Cross‐cultural adaptation and validation in China

“…SE is defined as an individual's belief in his ability to successfully perform an activity or behaviour. Bandura believes that SE is highly predictive of the initiation and continuous execution of behaviours (Bandura, 1986; Bilodeau et al, 2022). Applying this theory to the sick employees, it can be expected that the sick employees with high loneliness will be absent for a shorter time than the sick employees with low loneliness (Algeo et al, 2022).…”