Accept the Risk and Continue

Singanamalla, Sudheesh; Jang, Esther; Anderson, Richard; Kohno, Tadayoshi; Heimerl, Kurtis

doi:10.1145/3419394.3423645

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As result, we mapped 8 key roles to be carried out by a 6G architecture and 72 possible enabling technologies capable of performing these tasks. In addition, based on this literature review, we also mapped 4 architectural DSs, Approach of 6G Requirements [31], [32] x x x [33][34][35][36] x x x [37][38][39] x x [40][41][42] x x [43][44][45] x x x [46][47][48] x x x x [49], [50] x x x [51][52][53][54] x x x x x x x x [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] x [71], [72] x x x x x x [73], [74] x x x x x [75][76][77][78]…”

Section: State-of-art On 6gmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Detailed Relevance Analysis of Enabling Technologies for 6G Architectures

Pivoto,

Rezende,

Facina

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As society evolves as a whole, new demands arise with increasingly demanding prerequisites, consequently requiring more significant effort to be met. Such demands cover emerging applications, such as remote surgeries in Smart Health use cases, whose latency and reliability network requirements cannot be met by current communication systems; or simply improving current applications with more challenging requirements to be achieved, such as increasing the transmission rate in a mobile network, offering Quality of Service (QoS), and consequently, better user experience. Therefore, enabling technologies must be chosen to design an appropriate 6G architecture to address such demands. However, the explosion of emerging applications focused on different scopes and requirements to be met makes choosing these enabling technologies extremely complex and unpredictable. Thus, this article aims to create a methodology for analyzing the relevance of enabling technologies and use it to design an optimal architecture capable of meeting the 6G demands. For this purpose, two methods named as Average (AVG) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) have been selected, whose objective is to determine the relevance of an enabler for the 6G architecture, taking into account different degrees of influencing variables for this analysis, such as adherence to a certain architectural model; popularity in the research area; degree of innovation; synergy with other enablers; and support for requirements. Each of these methods presents a particular result. In the case of the AVG method, the criteria and variables are evaluated independently, and the arithmetic mean is employed to combine the evaluations into a single measure of suitability. In contrast, the AHP method considers the relative importance of criteria and variables in order to classify an optimal set of enabling technologies capable of fulfilling the key roles to be performed by a 6G architecture, and consequently meeting the main 6G demands. Our evaluation provides a unique perspective on 6G enablers, identifying issues and fostering research for future mobile architectures. The results obtained also provide researchers with the necessary information to stay updated on emerging enabling technologies and their suitability for designing new optimized 6G architectures. INDEX TERMS 6G architectures; 6G enabling technologies; 6G requirements; 6G use cases, AHP, relevance analysis. I. INTRODUCTION S INCE the introduction of 5G, the mobile network architecture has undergone profound transformations that range from the separation of the control and data planes and the adoption of a service-based architecture in the Core Network (CN) [1] to the disaggregation of the Radio

show abstract

Section: State-of-art On 6gmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Detailed Relevance Analysis of Enabling Technologies for 6G Architectures

Pivoto,

Rezende,

Facina

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Measurements. There is a long thread of studies examining the web's certificate ecosystem from various vantage points [50,51,62,63,71,94,107,120]. Studies have specifically examined the cost of HTTPS [91]; how certificates are managed from the web administrator side [29,36,127], the CA side [73], within root stores [84,119], and by CDNs [29,80]; and the response to specific security vulnerabilities [126] like Heartbleed [49,127].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hammurabi

Larisch

Aqeel

Lum

et al. 2022

Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes using a logic programming language to disentangle X.509 certificate validation policy from mechanism. Expressing validation policies in a logic programming language provides multiple benefits. First, policy and mechanism can be more independently written, augmented, and analyzed compared to the current practice of interweaving them within a C or C++ implementation. Once written, these policies can be easily shared and modified for use in different TLS clients. Further, logic programming allows us to determine when clients differ in their policies and use the power of imputation to automatically generate interesting certificates, e.g., a certificate that will be accepted by one browser but not by another.We present a new framework called Hammurabi for expressing validation policies, and we demonstrate that we can express the complex policies of the Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox web browsers in this framework. We confirm the fidelity of the Hammurabi policies by comparing the validation decisions they make with those made by the browsers themselves on over ten million certificate chains derived from Certificate Transparency logs, as well as 100K synthetic chains. We also use imputation to discover nine validation differences between the two browsers' policies. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of integrating Hammurabi into Firefox and the Go language in less than 100 lines of code each. CCS CONCEPTS• Security and privacy → Web protocol security; Logic and verification.

show abstract

“…Due to the DNS's two-staged structure and participation of different entities in the name resolution procedure, proposing a comprehensive DNS scheme that provides security properties in both stages can be feasible. However, complex DNS alternatives that require significant changes are unlikely to gain wide-scale adoption, or the possibility of ANSes being potentially reluctant to change (e.g., in adoption of DNSSEC [25] or [60,94,91]. These anonymizing mechanisms can be used compatibly with the other secure-DNS schemes.…”

Section: Persistence Ofmentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey And Evaluation of Secure-DNS Alternatives Through Passive Measurements

jahromi¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As security was not among the original DNS design goals, over ten secure-DNS schemes have been proposed to improve security and privacy during the name resolution process.One of the schemes is DNS-over-TLS (DoT), which relies on the Internet's PKI for establishing trust in recursive resolvers. The security research community has studied and improved security shortcomings in the web certificate ecosystem. DoT's certificates, on the other hand, have not been investigated comprehensively. This thesis analyzes the certificate ecosystem of DoT in comparison to HTTPS. The results are so far promising, as they show that DoT appears to have benefited from the PKI security advancements that were designed for HTTPS. The thesis then surveys secure-DNS schemes, and presents an evaluation framework to assess their security, availability, privacy, and anonymity benefits. Our evaluation illustrates that none of the DNS schemes secures the complete path of the domain name resolution. All rated schemes provide only partial security benefits in specific domain name resolution stages. The results shed light on the challenges of designing a comprehensive and widely-deployable secure-DNS scheme to secure the complete name resolution path.However, as some schemes can be combined, their resultant benefits can address individual shortcomings.

show abstract

Accept the Risk and Continue

Cited by 9 publications

References 24 publications

A Detailed Relevance Analysis of Enabling Technologies for 6G Architectures

A Detailed Relevance Analysis of Enabling Technologies for 6G Architectures

Hammurabi

Survey And Evaluation of Secure-DNS Alternatives Through Passive Measurements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About