2021
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.574443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerometric Gait Analysis Devices in Children—Will They Accept Them? Results From the AVAPed Study

Abstract: Aims: To assess children's acceptance to wear a 3D-accelerometer which is attached to the waist under real-world conditions, and also to compare gait speed during supervised testing with the non-supervised gait speed in every-day life.Methods: In a controlled observational, cross sectional study thirty subjects with cerebral palsy (CP), with level I&II of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and 30 healthy control children (Ctrl), aged 3–12 years, were asked to perform a 1-min-walking… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large majority of children and adolescents was willing to wear the sensors for a week and perceived them as only minimally affecting their everyday life motor activities. This is in line with previous studies investigating the acceptability of wrist-worn sensors in typically developing children (30), and a waist-worn sensor in children with cerebral palsy (31). Refusing to wear the sensors resulted only in 4% of missing values in our study.…”
Section: Acceptability and Completeness Of Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The large majority of children and adolescents was willing to wear the sensors for a week and perceived them as only minimally affecting their everyday life motor activities. This is in line with previous studies investigating the acceptability of wrist-worn sensors in typically developing children (30), and a waist-worn sensor in children with cerebral palsy (31). Refusing to wear the sensors resulted only in 4% of missing values in our study.…”
Section: Acceptability and Completeness Of Datasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As suggested in previous findings [ 28 ], acquiring normative data was feasible. The overall compliance with device use was good.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%