Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers – comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis

Abstract

Background ActiGraph accelerometers are a widely used tool to objectively measure physical activity (PA) behavior in young children and several validated cut-point sets exist to estimate time spent in different PA intensities (sedentary time, light PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA). Applying different cut-point sets leads to large and meaningful differences in results. So far, only cut-point sets validated for the vertical axis have been compared and only the influence on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA has been analyzed. Methods A range of validated cut-point sets with their respective epoch length was applied to analyze cross-sectional data of the Swiss Preschoolers’ Health Study (SPLASHY): 1) Vertical axis in combination with an epoch length of 15 s (VA-15), 2) Vertical axis in combination with an epoch length of 60 s (VA-60) and 3) Vector magnitude in combination with an epoch length of 60 s (VM-60). PA was measured for eight consecutive days using ActiGraph accelerometers (wGT3X-BT). Three days were required to be included in the analysis (minimum two weekdays and one weekend-day with at least ten hours recording per day). Results Four hundred forty-five preschoolers (mean age 3.9 ± 0.5 years; 46% girls) had valid accelerometer measurements. A longer epoch (VA-60 vs VA-15) resulted in 2% less sedentary time (ST), 18% more light PA (LPA) and 51% less moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA); using the vector magnitude compared to the vertical axis (VM-60 vs VA-60) resulted in 34% less ST, 27% more LPA and 63% more MVPA (all p ≤ 0.001). Comparing all three sets of cut-points, ST ranged from 4.0 to 6.2 h, LPA from 5.1 to 7.6 h and MVPA from 0.8 to 1.6 h. Conclusions Estimated time spent in different PA intensities was strongly influenced by the choice of cut-point sets. Both, axis selection and epoch length need to be considered when comparing different studies especially when they relate PA behavior to health. The differences in the prevalence of children fulfilling PA guidelines highlight the relevance of these findings. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41045021 (date of registration: 21.03.2014). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6837-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Obesity and Body Composition in Preschool Children with Different Levels of Actigraphy-Derived Physical Activity—A Cross-Sectional Study

“…The device detects body movement acceleration in three planes. ActiGraph accelerometers are a widely used tool to objectively measure PA level in preschool children [24]. The device was attached to the participant's right hip.…”

Objectively-measured sedentary time and physical activity in a bi-ethnic sample of young children: variation by socio-demographic, temporal and perinatal factors

“…Total physical activity constituted the sum of light physical activity and MVPA minutes per day. Daily vector magnitude counts per minute (CPM) was used to represent the average physical activity intensity [21]. Each valid day was classified as 'inactive' if the new international guideline daily amount of physical activity for 3 to 4y olds had not been met (≥180 min of total physical activity, of which ≥60 min must be MVPA) [7].…”

Genetic variants related to physical activity or sedentary behaviour: a systematic review

“…Likewise, there are some limitations related to the use of objective measurements to define phenotypes that should be considered when interpreting the results [ 57 – 59 ]. For example, a single accelerometer may not capture all relevant activity [ 60 , 61 ] and the use of different cut-offs points and methods for processing the accelerometer data are known to create large and significant differences in the estimated physical activity level [ 62 , 63 ]. Thus, it is possible that the studies included in this review capture different aspects of physical activity and sedentary behaviour.…”