Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1988
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(88)90741-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration of the polarized proton beam at the KEK 12 GeV ps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the material below is from Sato (1988) and Sato et al (1988). In the Booster, two pulsed quadrupoles were installed to jump the intrinsic resonances, and two pulsed dipoles to correct the closed orbit imperfections.…”
Section: Kek-psmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the material below is from Sato (1988) and Sato et al (1988). In the Booster, two pulsed quadrupoles were installed to jump the intrinsic resonances, and two pulsed dipoles to correct the closed orbit imperfections.…”
Section: Kek-psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that the horizontal betatron oscillations cannot always be ignored during polarized beam acceleration. The resonance strengths in the Booster are tabulated by Sato et al (1988). Because the Booster was a combined-function strong-focusing synchrotron, which included a strong sextupole field component to correct the chromaticity, some depolarization arose from higher order resonances (not reviewed here).…”
Section: Kek-psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the above scenarios still rely on conventional particle accelerators that are typically very large in scale and budget [16] . In circular accelerators, depolarizing spin resonances must be compensated by applying complex correction techniques to maintain the beam's polarization [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . In linear accelerators, such a reduction of polarization can be neglected due to the very short interaction time between particle bunches and the accelerating fields.…”
Section: The Need For Polarized Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above scenarios still rely on conventional particle accelerators that are typically very large in scale and budget [16] . In circular accelerators, depolarizing spin resonances must be compensated by applying complex correction techniques to maintain the beam's polarization [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . In linear accelerators, such a reduction of polarization can be neglected due to the very short interaction time between particle bunches and accelerating fields.…”
Section: The Need For Polarized Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%