2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration and Deflection Analysis for Class C Edge Protection Systems in Construction Work

Abstract: 13The requirements for class C edge protection systems in construction works (according 14 to EN 13374 code) are studied in this paper. Maximum acceleration suffered by a 15 falling body and maximum deflection of the protection system were analyzed through 16 some finite element models and real size experiments. The aim of this work is to 17 determine which value for deflection system entails an acceleration that is safe for the 18 human body. This value is compared with the requirements given by current versi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the lanyards tested could arrest the mass at forces lower than 6 kN. According to the PPE extensions drawn in the Figure 12, an elongation of 800 mm is necessary; this is a similar value to the deflection studied by the authors for edge protection systems in construction work [15].…”
Section: Fall Factor 2 Tests (Ff = 2)supporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…None of the lanyards tested could arrest the mass at forces lower than 6 kN. According to the PPE extensions drawn in the Figure 12, an elongation of 800 mm is necessary; this is a similar value to the deflection studied by the authors for edge protection systems in construction work [15].…”
Section: Fall Factor 2 Tests (Ff = 2)supporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, none of these four lanyards (PT1 and PT2) were able to retain the mass at tolerable forces, lower than 8 kN. Restricting this study to only those having a length of about 1.5 m, prototypes (PT1 and PT2) group (Tests 9, 10, 11, 12), the results are better than those obtained in the commercialized (T1 and T2) group (Tests 13,14,15,16), for the reason that in the first group, only one prototype snapped, while in the second group, three commercialized lanyards failed. In addition, among those that retained the load, the maximum arrest force presented low values in the first group.…”
Section: Fall Factor 2 Tests (Ff = 2)mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Invest in green technologies for waste management, water and energy savings, as well as their sources. Train personnel in sustainable construction, health and safety practices and sensitize them with ongoing environmental education, e.g., as in [ 44 , 45 ]. Maintain collaboration among all project stakeholders and ensure that they master the benefits of sustainability and circular economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve safety conditions regarding accidents involving falls, previous studies [1][2][3][4][5][6] have been conducted, using numerical models of EPS built with finite elements technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%