2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.04023
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating Understanding of Scientific Experiments with End to End Symbolic Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For concreteness, we use the recently proposed PySR framework (Cranmer et al 2020), which uses a genetic algorithm to perform symbolic regression. 2 Similar studies have been done in several physical domains (Battaglia et al 2016;Chang et al 2016;Iten et al 2020;Udrescu & Tegmark 2020;Arechiga et al 2021;Lemos et al 2022), but to the best of our knowledge, not in exoplanetary science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For concreteness, we use the recently proposed PySR framework (Cranmer et al 2020), which uses a genetic algorithm to perform symbolic regression. 2 Similar studies have been done in several physical domains (Battaglia et al 2016;Chang et al 2016;Iten et al 2020;Udrescu & Tegmark 2020;Arechiga et al 2021;Lemos et al 2022), but to the best of our knowledge, not in exoplanetary science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…More recently, ML is also being used to facilitate tasks that traditionally have fallen within the domain of theorists, e.g. performing symbolic computations [6,7] or deriving analytical formulas by training a symbolic regression on synthetic data [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that while they do have the expected form for a generator of rotations in two dimensions, they are essentially the same transformation, and differ only by an overall sign. This implies that they fail the orthogonality condition -indeed, we find that the dominant contribution to the large total loss in that case is from the orthogonality loss (13). Since the total loss is large and does not improve with further training (see the orange line for N g = 2 in Figure 2), these two are not valid generators and should be discarded.…”
Section: Length-preserving Transformations In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Over the last decade, there has been increased interest in applications of machine learning (ML) to highdimensional physics data as a sensitive tool for event simulation, data analysis, and statistical inference [3][4][5]. More recently, ML is also being used to facilitate tasks that traditionally have fallen within the domain of theorists, e.g., performing symbolic computations [6,7] or deriving analytical formulas by training a symbolic regression on synthetic data [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%