2019
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.11419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating the Science of SCD Therapies—Is a Cure Possible?

Abstract: Nearly 7 decades have passed since seminal studies of hemoglobin led to the characterization of sickle cell anemia as the first defined molecular disease. These foundational insights into sickle cell disease (SCD) initiated an exciting era of medicine that has substantially expanded the understanding of the molecular basis of thousands of disorders over the ensuing years. The field of molecular medicine is now at a pivotal moment in its history, a time when scientific capabilities to read, edit, and reprogram … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experimental system has previously been used to investigate SCD pathophysiology, including rheological mechanisms of vaso‐occlusion (Higgins et al , ; Higgins et al , ; Lu et al , ; Lu et al , ), correlations of in vitro and in vivo phenotypes (Wood et al , ), and the use of in vitro SCT phenotypes as a treatment target for SCD (Lu et al , ). There are currently no good in vitro biomarkers for the management of SCD (Kalpatthi & Novelli, ), and the need for their development has increased dramatically recently with the advent of experimental therapies for SCD whose optimization and comparative assessment crucially depends on the availability of validated in vitro markers (Benz et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental system has previously been used to investigate SCD pathophysiology, including rheological mechanisms of vaso‐occlusion (Higgins et al , ; Higgins et al , ; Lu et al , ; Lu et al , ), correlations of in vitro and in vivo phenotypes (Wood et al , ), and the use of in vitro SCT phenotypes as a treatment target for SCD (Lu et al , ). There are currently no good in vitro biomarkers for the management of SCD (Kalpatthi & Novelli, ), and the need for their development has increased dramatically recently with the advent of experimental therapies for SCD whose optimization and comparative assessment crucially depends on the availability of validated in vitro markers (Benz et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complicating the risk-benefit assessment is that transplantation or gene therapy technically offers the hope of a cure for SCD [25,26] unlike many clinical trials, including most cancer trials. Although the consent forms for these clinical trials stress that these are research interventions aiming to make transplantation and gene therapy safer and more effective, they also recognize that the participants' SCD could be cured while explicitly cautioning "this cannot be guaranteed and your disease may return."…”
Section: Personal and Thoughtful Risk-benefit Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, curing SCD either through stem cell transplantation or gene therapy has become a reality for a small number of patients. 2 Given the October 2019 joint National Institutes of Health (NIH)-Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funding declaration, inclusion of patients from high disease burden resource-scarce settings in such trials of novel curative therapies seems plausible. 3 Prospects appear particularly promising for SCD patients in resource-scarce settings worldwide, where the need is greatest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%