Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1080/02626660009492309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating shear velocity in gravel-bed channels

Abstract: The behaviour of the shear velocity along a gravel-bed channel is investigated experimentally in the presence of a negative pressure gradient (accelerating flow). Different methods of estimation of the shear velocity, derived from vertical profiles of the mean longitudinal point velocity, are examined and a new method is proposed. Results show that the proposed method of estimation is comparable to the St Venant and Clauser's methods. At a specific cross section, for constant bottom slope and relative roughnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 presents the comparison of the boundary-layer characteristics method (u *BL ) with the loglaw method (u *log ) and the parabolic method (u *par ). The boundary-layer parameter empirical constant C was set to 4.4, as determined for laboratory data (Afzalimehr & Anctil, 2000). All u *BL were within ±30% of respective u *log .…”
Section: Local Shear Velocity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 presents the comparison of the boundary-layer characteristics method (u *BL ) with the loglaw method (u *log ) and the parabolic method (u *par ). The boundary-layer parameter empirical constant C was set to 4.4, as determined for laboratory data (Afzalimehr & Anctil, 2000). All u *BL were within ±30% of respective u *log .…”
Section: Local Shear Velocity Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the laboratory data of , Afzalimehr & Anctil (2000) suggested the following formulation for determining shear velocity in non-uniform flows over gravel-bed channels:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afzalimehr and Anctil (2000) and Afzalimehr and Rennie (2009) claimed C = 4.4 using based on laboratory experiments and field studies, respectively; u max is the maximum flow velocity in a velocity profile; δ * is the displacement thickness; and θ is the momentum thickness. According to Schlichting and Geresten (2000), these thicknesses are defined as:…”
Section: Calculations Friction Factor With Bedformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the total shear velocity (u * ) is calculated by using the BLCM method (Afzalimehr and Anctil, 2000) as follow:…”
Section: Calculations Friction Factor With Bedformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prevents the presentation of a general pattern of Reynolds normal stress distribution and to use it for evaluating shear velocity. Shear velocity u * was also calculated using the boundary layer characteristics method (BLCM) for each velocity profile as follows (Afzalimehr and Anctil, 2000):…”
Section: Fig 32 Fit Of the Log Law To The Inner Layer Data (Continmentioning
confidence: 99%