2018
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating Discovery of Functional Mutant Alleles in Cancer

Abstract: Most mutations in cancer are rare, which complicates the identifi cation of therapeutically signifi cant mutations and thus limits the clinical impact of genomic profi ling in patients with cancer. Here, we analyzed 24,592 cancers including 10,336 prospectively sequenced patients with advanced disease to identify mutant residues arising more frequently than expected in the absence of selection. We identifi ed 1,165 statistically signifi cant hotspot mutations of which 80% arose in 1 in 1,000 or fewer patients.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
291
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
291
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequencing data were analysed as previously described to identify somatic single-nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations and structural arrangements 40 . Additionally, hotspot alterations were identified using an adaptation of a previously described method 41 applied to a cohort of 24,592 sequenced human cancers 42 . For gene level analysis, select genes within our targeted 341/410 MSK-IMPACT panel involved in the RTK/RAS/RAF, PIK3CA/AKT/MTOR, and cell cycle checkpoint pathways were selected using the KEGG pathway database 43 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing data were analysed as previously described to identify somatic single-nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations and structural arrangements 40 . Additionally, hotspot alterations were identified using an adaptation of a previously described method 41 applied to a cohort of 24,592 sequenced human cancers 42 . For gene level analysis, select genes within our targeted 341/410 MSK-IMPACT panel involved in the RTK/RAS/RAF, PIK3CA/AKT/MTOR, and cell cycle checkpoint pathways were selected using the KEGG pathway database 43 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Annotation was performed using canonical transcripts and publicly available databases dbSNPv150, 25 gnomADv2.0.2 (http://gnomad.broad institute.org/), 26 COSMICv74, 27 ClinVar(25-02-2018), 28 dbNSF Pv2.9.3 18 and known cancer Hotspots. 29 Loss of function (LoF) assessment was performed using the snpEff tool. SNVs/InDels were discarded as benign/likely benign/polymorphic based on population minor allele frequency (popmax) ≥0.1% from gnomAD database.…”
Section: Variant Annotation Prioritization and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14,17 A combination of mutation function predictors 30 was employed to define the potential functional impact of each missense SNV, as previously described. 13 Mutation hotspots were assigned according to Chang et al 31…”
Section: A S S I V E L Y P a R A L L E L S E Q U E N C I N G A N D mentioning
confidence: 99%