Accelerated Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac MR Imaging with Isotropic Spatial Resolution Using Compressed Sensing: Initial Experience

Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate the use of low-dimensional-structure self-learning and thresholding (LOST) compressed sensing acquisition and reconstruction in the assessment of left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) scar by using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with isotropic spatial resolution. Materials andMethods:The study was approved by the local institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. All subjects provided written informed consent. Twenty-eight patients (eight women; mean age, 58.0 years 6 10.1) with a history of atrial fibrillation were recruited for the LA LGE study, and 14 patients (five women; mean age, 54.2 years 6 18.6) were recruited for assessment of LV myocardial infarction. With use of a pseudorandom k-space undersampling pattern, threefold accelerated three-dimensional (3D) LGE data were acquired with isotropic spatial resolution and reconstructed off-line by using LOST. For comparison, subjects were also imaged by using standard 3D LGE protocols with nonisotropic spatial resolution. Images were compared qualitatively by three cardiologists with regard to diagnostic value, presence of enhancement, and image quality. The signed rank test and Wilcoxon unpaired two-sample test were used to test the hypothesis that there would be no significant difference in image quality ratings with different resolutions. Results:Interpretable images were obtained in 26 of the 28 patients (93%) in the LA LGE study.LGE was seen in 17 of 30 cases (57%) with nonisotropic resolution and in 18 cases (60%) with isotropic resolution. Diagnostic quality scores of isotropic images were significantly higher than those of nonisotropic images with coronal views (median, 3 vs 2, respectively [25th and 75th percentiles: 3, 3 vs 2, 3]; P , .001) and sagittal views (median, 3 vs 2 [25th and 75th percentiles: 3, 4 vs 2, 3]; P , .001) but lower with axial views (median, 4 vs 3 [25th and 75th percentiles: 3, 4 vs 3, 3]; P , .001). For the LV LGE study, all patients had interpretable images.LGE was seen in six of 14 patients (43%), with 100% agreement between both data sets. Diagnostic quality scores of high-isotropic-resolution LV images were higher than those of nonisotropic images with short-axis views (median, 4 vs 3 [25th and 75th percentiles: 3, 4 vs 2, 3]; P = .014) and two-chamber views (median, 4 vs 3 [25th and 75th percentiles: 3, 4 vs 2, 3]; P = .001). Conclusion:An accelerated LGE acquisition with LOST enables imaging with high isotropic spatial resolution for improved assessment of LV, LA, and pulmonary vein scar.q RSNA, 2012 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup /suppl

A swine model of infarct-related reentrant ventricular tachycardia: Electroanatomic, magnetic resonance, and histopathological characterization

“…Imaging parameters were as follows: repetition time = 6.1 ms, echo time = 2.7 ms, flip angle = 25°, field of view = 270 × 270 × 112 mm 3 , spatial resolution =1×1×1 mm 3 , and compressed sensing acceleration factor = 4. 9 A respiratory navigator (2-dimensional spiral pencil beam) placed on the dome of the right hemidiaphragm was used for respiratory motion compensation with use of prospective real-time correction with a 5-mm end-expiration gating window. Saturation bands along the phase-encoding direction were used to reduce fold-over artifacts.…”

DAGAN: Deep De-Aliasing Generative Adversarial Networks for Fast Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction

“…Although there are promising studies applying fast CS-MRI in clinical environments [31], [32], [33], most routine clinical MRI scanning is still based on standard fully-sampled Cartesian sequences or is accelerated only using parallel imaging. The main challenges are: (1) satisfying the incoherence criteria required by CS-MRI [1]; (2) the widely applied sparsifying transforms might be too simple to capture complex image details associated with subtle differences of biological tissues, e.g., TV based sparsifying transform penalises local variation in the reconstructed images but can introduce staircase artefacts and the wavelet transform enforces point singularities and isotropic features but orthogonal wavelets may lead to blocky artefacts [34], [35], [36]; (3) nonlinear optimisation solvers usually involve iterative computation that may result in relatively long reconstruction time [1]; (4) inappropriate hyperparameters predicted in current CS-MRI methods can cause over-regularisation that will yield overly smooth and unnatural looking reconstructions or images with residual undersampling artefacts [1].…”

Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction

“…Cerebral MRA is a promising candidate for accelerated acquisition with CS because high-signal vessels are sparse in space. Despite increased investigations into the clinical application of this technique, [13][14][15][16] only a few studies of sparse MRI have been reported in the field of NCE MRA. 17 Introduction of this novel technique into clinical practice will require a valid comparison with an appropriate evaluation that simulates clinical practice.…”