2002
DOI: 10.1097/00000374-200212000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acamprosate Inhibits the Binding and Neurotoxic Effects of Trans-ACPD, Suggesting a Novel Site of Action at Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Abstract: Na-acamprosate demonstrates the binding and functional characteristics that are consistent with a group I mGluR antagonist. The functional similarities between Na-acamprosate and SIB-1893 support an interaction of Na-acamprosate at mGluR5s. The neuroprotective properties of acamprosate and possibly its ability to reduce craving in alcohol-dependent patients may result from its alterations in glutamatergic transmission through mGluRs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) The finding that MPEP evokes anxiolytic-and antidepressant-like effects in rats (Tatarczynska et al, 2001;Pilc et al, 2002) also has implications for the treatment of alcoholism due to the high comorbidity with these psychiatric disorders. (iii) Furthermore, Harris et al (2002) showed that acamprosate exhibits binding and functional characteristics that are consistent with an mGluR5 antagonist. These authors further speculate that acamprosate's ability to reduce relapse rates in alcoholic patients may result from its alterations in glutamatergic neurotransmission through mGluR5s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(ii) The finding that MPEP evokes anxiolytic-and antidepressant-like effects in rats (Tatarczynska et al, 2001;Pilc et al, 2002) also has implications for the treatment of alcoholism due to the high comorbidity with these psychiatric disorders. (iii) Furthermore, Harris et al (2002) showed that acamprosate exhibits binding and functional characteristics that are consistent with an mGluR5 antagonist. These authors further speculate that acamprosate's ability to reduce relapse rates in alcoholic patients may result from its alterations in glutamatergic neurotransmission through mGluR5s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several possible modes of action of acamprosate have been described (Mann et al, 2008); however, a body of evidence suggests that acamprosate interacts with NMDA receptors and/or mGluR5 (Mann et al, 2008;Harris et al, 2002;Madamba et al, 1996). To test these putative interactions, we applied an extensive screening panel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many molecular candidate targets have been described (Spanagel and Vengeliene, 2013;De Witte et al, 2005;Mann et al, 2008) but the only accumulated evidence was found with respect to an interaction with the glutamate system. In concert, these studies suggest that acamprosate attenuates hyperglutamatergic states that occur during early and protracted abstinence, possibly involving N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) (Spanagel and Vengeliene, 2013;De Witte et al, 2005;Mann et al, 2008;Rammes et al, 2001;Harris et al, 2002). A prominent theory in the alcohol research field posits that chronic alcohol consumption leads to glutamatergic dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, postsynaptic aspects of corticoaccumbens glutamatergic signaling regulate either the self-administration of various drugs of abuse, or the potential to relapse to drug-seeking, in both humans and laboratory animals. Acamprosate, a mixed antagonist at the NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) and the mGluR5 subtype of the Group1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) [71,72], is clinically effective at treating alcoholism [73,74] and may prove to be effective for treating psychomotor stimulant and opiate addiction [75,76]. Moreover, direct pharmacological manipulation of glutamate receptors within the PFC or the NAC result in reduced behavioral responsiveness to various drugs of abuse, including cocaine [48,50,53,[77][78][79]; but see 80], alcohol [e.g., 44, 81,82], amphetamines [e.g., [83][84][85][86][87][88][89] and opiates [90-92, but see 79], and systemic administration of antagonists of glutamate receptors blocks several aspects of nicotine reward in laboratory animals [e.g., 93-100, but see 101].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%