Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Teaching with Technology

Boysen‐Osborn, Megan; Cooney, Robert; Gottlieb, Michael; Chan, Teresa M.; Brown, Aaron; King, Andrew; Tobias, Adam; Thoma, Brent

doi:10.5811/westjem.2017.2.33076

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also utilized several social media calls via Twitter to crowdsource and identify additional articles, in line with new practices in the literature for triangulating literature in a domain. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Finally, we consulted numerous medical education experts within our specialty to identify any papers we may have missed.…”

Section: Phase 1: Discoverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED‐MedEd)

Chan

Jordan

Clarke

et al. 2022

AEM Education and Training

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The health professions education (HPE) landscape has shifted substantively with increasing professionalization of research and scholarship. Clinician educators seeking to become competitive in this domain often pursue fellowships and master's degrees in HPE, but there are few resources for the continuing professional development (CPD) of those who seek to continue developing their scholarly practice within HPE. Acknowledging the multiple players in this landscape, the authors sought to design a new "beyond beginners" HPE research program using a novel needs assessment planning process. Methods:The authors developed and conducted a new three-phase, five-step process that sets forth a programmatic approach to conducting a needs assessment for a CPD course in HPE research. The five steps of the CLAIM method are: Competitive analysis, Literature review with thematic analysis, Ask stakeholders, Internal review by experts, and Mapping of a curriculum. These steps are organized into three phases (Discovery, Convergence, and Synthesis). literature, current stakeholder perceptions, expert consultation, and Results: Over a 12-month period, the authors completed a comprehensive needs assessment. The CLAIM process revealed that longitudinal digital connection, diverse and in depth exposure to HPE research methods, skills around scholarly publishing, and leadership and management of research would be beneficial to our design. Conclusions:The CLAIM method provided scaffolding to help the authors create a robust curriculum that adopts a scholarly approach for developing a HPE research course. This needs assessment methodology may be useful in other CPD contexts.

show abstract

Section: Phase 1: Discoverymentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED‐MedEd)

Chan

Jordan

Clarke

et al. 2022

AEM Education and Training

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Medical Education After the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Earthquake in Türkiye: Adaptation and Resilience in Medical Schools Under Unexpected Conditions

Altintas,

Gürpınar,

Ergönül

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers on Evaluating Digital Scholarship

Quinn

Chan

Sampson

et al. 2018

Cureus

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditionally, scholarship that was recognized for promotion and tenure consisted of clinical research, bench research, and grant funding. Recent trends have allowed for differing approaches to scholarship, including digital publication. As increasing numbers of trainees and faculty turn to online educational resources, it is imperative to critically evaluate these resources. This article summarizes five key papers that address the appraisal of digital scholarship and describes their relevance to junior clinician educators and faculty developers.In May 2017, the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Faculty Incubator program focused on the topic of digital scholarship, providing and discussing papers relevant to the topic. We augmented this list of papers with further suggestions by guest experts and by an open call via Twitter for other important papers. Through this process, we created a list of 38 papers in total on the topic of evaluating digital scholarship. In order to determine which of these papers best describe how to evaluate digital scholarship, the authorship group assessed the papers using a modified Delphi approach to build consensus.In this paper we present the five most highly rated papers from our process about evaluating digital scholarship. We summarize each paper and discuss its specific relevance to junior faculty members and to faculty developers. These papers provide a framework for assessing the quality of digital scholarship, so that junior faculty can recommend high-quality educational resources to their trainees. These papers help guide educators on how to produce high quality digital scholarship and maximize recognition and credit in respect to receiving promotion and tenure.

show abstract

Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Teaching with Technology

Cited by 9 publications

References 38 publications

Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED‐MedEd)

Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED‐MedEd)

Medical Education After the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Earthquake in Türkiye: Adaptation and Resilience in Medical Schools Under Unexpected Conditions

Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers on Evaluating Digital Scholarship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About