2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00116-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole act in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
166
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
166
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been an extensive scholarly discussion on the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act (cf., e.g, Henderson et al, 1998;Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002;Shane, 2004;Sampat, 2006). Empirical analysis of the German reform is nonetheless justified because it may not necessarily have had the same kinds of effects that were observed in the U.S.. We already noted how the German reform effectively differed from its U.S. counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There has been an extensive scholarly discussion on the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act (cf., e.g, Henderson et al, 1998;Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002;Shane, 2004;Sampat, 2006). Empirical analysis of the German reform is nonetheless justified because it may not necessarily have had the same kinds of effects that were observed in the U.S.. We already noted how the German reform effectively differed from its U.S. counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The rise of the university Technology Transfer Office (TTO) and the increasing attempts of universities to capture formal IP have had a profound impact on the nature of scientific efforts (Shane, 2004). These efforts have led to the creation of a new commercial focus on the part of the universities to create valuable IP and exploit it for financial gain (Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002). For some, this focus on commercialization undermines the public commons of science, weakening the institutions of open science through the imposition of private norms on public activities (Nelson, 2004).…”
Section: Conflicts Over Ip and University Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such a sharp increase in university patenting (Henderson et al, 1998;Mowery and Ziedonis, 2002), universities and other publicly funded research institutions are no longer considered as mere contributors to the increase in the stock of fundamental knowledge; they are increasingly seen as direct contributors to invention 1 . Thus, invention generation and technology transfer have become a major public policy issue and a concern for economic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%