Academic journals cannot simply require authors to declare that they used ChatGPT

Tang, Gengyan

doi:10.1007/s11845-023-03374-x

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The academic community is stirred by consequences of potential uses of ChatGPT-generated content (Tang, 2023). As the texts produced by AI may successfully follow language patterns typical of the academic writing style and mimic research articles, there is a growing concern that unscrupulous researchers may be tempted to generate partially or more extensively texts, using ChatGPT, and deceitfully pass off AI-created texts as their writings.…”

Section: Chatgpt In Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models

Tikhonova,

Raitskaya

2023

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: the JLE editors analyse the scope and depth of the subject area of ChatGPT and related topics based on the Scopus database. The Scopus statistics prove a skyrocketing rise in the number of publications in the field in question during 2023. The major alarming themes cover authorship and integrity related to AI-assisted writing, threats to educational practices, medicine, and malevolent uses of ChatGPT. Keywords Explained: the key terminology is defined, including generative pre-trained transformers (GPT); ChatGPT; artificial intelligence (AI); AI chatbots; natural language processing (NLP); large language models; Open AI; large language model (LLM). International Research on ChatGPT: as of September 24 2023, the Scopus database has indexed 1,935 publications, with “ChatGPT” in the title, abstract, or keywords. A skyrocketing rise in the number of research has been reported since the early days of 2023. 1,925 indexed publications out of 1,935 were published in 2023. Most of them came from the USA, India, the UK, and China. The number of documents indexed in the Scopus database as well as PubMed, arXiv and others are exponentially rising. ChatGPT in Education: the academic community has been actively discussing the challenges education will face in the era of ChatGPT in the context of the fundamental threats posed to the educational system. The latter include assessment procedures, information accuracy, and skill devaluation. As many complex technologies, generative pre-trained transformers are ambivalent in nature, providing a great potential for learning and education at large, including new approaches based on critical thinking and awareness of the pros and cons of AI. ChatGPT in Science: great prospects for text generation and improvements in language quality adjoin to dubious authorship and potentially inconsistent and erroneous parts in the AI-produced texts. Publishers and journals are working out new publishing policies, including publishing ethics towards AI-assisted or AI-improved submissions. Conclusion: JLE is planning to revise its editorial policy to address the new challenges from AI technologies. JLE editors welcome new submissions of research articles and reviews as well as special issues on ChatGPT and related themes, with potential applications of chatbots in education, innovative approaches to writing assignments, facilitating personalized learning, academic integrity issues related to AI-supported writing, etc. in focus.

show abstract

Section: Chatgpt In Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Authorship of such texts as submissions is raising doubts (Hufton, 2023). Academics and researchers express worries as AI does not bear any responsibility for the produced information (Tang, 2023). In late 2022 and early 2023, several preprints and publications were released, with ChatGPT indicated as a co-author.…”

Section: Chatgpt In Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models

Tikhonova,

Raitskaya

2023

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…of research. These occurrences triggered a serious debate over ethical aspects of ChatGPT authorship and limitations to the technology appliance in tests and examinations (Tollefson, 2023;Tang, 2023;Illia, Colleoni, & Zyglidopoulos, 2023;Okaibedi, 2023).…”

Section: Revisions In the Jle Editorial Policy On Authorshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Integrity: Author-Related and Journal-Related Issues

Raitskaya,

Tikhonova

2023

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Author-related and journal-related metrics have long been the target for manipulations on part of some researchers, journals, and occasionally countries, eager to rank higher or get other benefits. Games played with metrics are abundant and may be triggered by rigid “publish-or-perish” national or university policies and consequent pursuit for benefits. In addition, new technologies make headway to unprecedented schemes in research production and promotion. The JLE Editors aim to inform JLE readers of their stance on the current revision of the JLE ethical guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers in response to the new challenges. Basic Concepts Related to Academic Integrity: The key concepts related to academic integrity are commented on, including some particulars about academic integrity, plagiarism, academic misconduct, fabrication and falsification of data, peer review manipulations, citation manipulations, and predatory journals. Revisions in the JLE Editorial Policy on Authorship: With the ChatGPT entering the realm of science, the technology caused a heated debate over the ethical aspects of Artificial Intellect (AI) generated submissions to scholarly journals. The JLE editors share a rather popular stance that submissions cannot be subject to ChatGPT generation or revision. Conclusion: The JLE has been revising its ethical guidelines as of authorship, including the limits for ChatGPT uses in submissions. The JLE editors apprise all stakeholders of the revised guidelines that cover the use of generative pre-trained transformers in submission generation.

show abstract

“…В начале 2023 г. было опубликовано несколько научных статей, где ChatGPT был указан как соавтор (например, [4]). Академическое сообщество широко обсуждает невозможность соавторства со стороны искусственного интеллекта, так как важной частью авторства является принятие ответственности за исследование [5][6][7][8].…”

Section: интеграция образования т 28 № 1 2024unclassified

Prospects for ChatGPT Application in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of International Research

Raitskaya,

Lambovska

2023

IntegrEdu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The arrival of advanced Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) in late 2022 resulted in a wide spread of the technology, capable of generating texts of any genres, complexity, and styles. Written communication embraces all spheres of human educational and professional activities that caused a lightning speed at which the technology was introduced into education, science, journalism, mass communication, medicine, etc. The academic community is vigorously discussing the plausible consequences and potential of ChatGPT for various domains, especially education, medicine, and science at large. The review seeks to analyze international publications on ChatGPT’s impact and potential in higher education and to identify the key lines of research. Materials and Methods. Based on the PRISMA methodology the authors selected 190 articles and reviews indexed in the Scopus database with the inclusion criteria in focus (period, languages, field, themes). The publications were analyzed and distributed among seven thematic clusters. Results. As a result of the analysis of the publications, the following clusters were formed: higher education (71 documents), education in various areas (37 documents), writing and language learning (24 documents), assessment in educational systems (22 documents), medical education (18 documents), ethical issues and academic integrity (15 documents), and perception of ChatGPT on part of students and educators (12 documents). Discussion and Conclusion. The analysis of the ChatGPT potential and negative aspects in higher education allows for singling out the subject areas where the most essential transformations will take place: assessment of knowledge and skills, information credibility, scope of competence and skills formed in higher education, ethical issues of research, various aspects of professional training. The authors’ conclusions correlate with the reviews on ChatGPT published earlier. Addressing the new challenges requires the system of education to be transformed, new forms of learning and assessment to be introduced. The review results may be applied in further research on the topic. Given a skyrocketing rise in the number of publications on ChatGPT, researchers ought to keep track of new research in the emerging subject area.

show abstract

Academic journals cannot simply require authors to declare that they used ChatGPT

Cited by 8 publications

References 7 publications

ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models

ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models

Academic Integrity: Author-Related and Journal-Related Issues

Prospects for ChatGPT Application in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of International Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About