2016
DOI: 10.5456/wpll.18.3.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic involvement in Outreach: Best practice case studies from health and languages

Abstract: This paper will examine the role academic colleagues can play in the Widening Participation process (predominately outreach), by providing examples of innovative practice from the University of East Anglia. At the University of East Anglia a unique academic post is held in each Faculty to ensure that Widening Participation students are supported throughout their time at university and that subject-specific outreach sessions can utilise world-leading research to raise aspirations. This paper will highlight exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conditions attached to funding, particularly funding associated with the OFFA allocation, mean that this conflict can be exacerbated by timeconsuming evaluation and reporting requirements that are managed by 'professionals' or academics in different departments. The consequence is that academics can be dissuaded from participating in such projects, depriving WP students of the essential academic contribution needed to enhance their capacity to reach HE (see Brown, 2012: 104;Harris and Ridealgh, 2016). Non-participation is unfortunate and we ought to recognise that much can be gained from effective collaboration between academics and non-academics.…”
Section: Forms Of Funding the 'Academic'/'professional' Distinction And Institutional Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions attached to funding, particularly funding associated with the OFFA allocation, mean that this conflict can be exacerbated by timeconsuming evaluation and reporting requirements that are managed by 'professionals' or academics in different departments. The consequence is that academics can be dissuaded from participating in such projects, depriving WP students of the essential academic contribution needed to enhance their capacity to reach HE (see Brown, 2012: 104;Harris and Ridealgh, 2016). Non-participation is unfortunate and we ought to recognise that much can be gained from effective collaboration between academics and non-academics.…”
Section: Forms Of Funding the 'Academic'/'professional' Distinction And Institutional Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%