Handbook of Academic Integrity 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Integrity in Social Sciences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The academic community is strongly opposed to explicitly stating the mentor's liability in the case that the thesis does not meet integrity standards, so the paragraph is just a statement of the obvious the mentor supervises…. As such, this provision should not constitute part of the law, despite the fact that mentoring is the most powerful tool in preventing non-academic behaviour (Löfström, 2016). Perhaps the most rational suggestion is to acknowledge that the mentor shall perform his or her supervising duties with a reasonable degree of care (or to a reasonable extent).…”
Section: Originality Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic community is strongly opposed to explicitly stating the mentor's liability in the case that the thesis does not meet integrity standards, so the paragraph is just a statement of the obvious the mentor supervises…. As such, this provision should not constitute part of the law, despite the fact that mentoring is the most powerful tool in preventing non-academic behaviour (Löfström, 2016). Perhaps the most rational suggestion is to acknowledge that the mentor shall perform his or her supervising duties with a reasonable degree of care (or to a reasonable extent).…”
Section: Originality Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%