Academic Integrity Campaign in Indonesia

Siaputra, Ide Bagus; Santosa, Dimas Armand

doi:10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_4-1

Cited by 10 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Students are brought to a certain value that prohibits academic cheating. Strong culture expected to prevent and overcome academic dishonesty (Siaputra and Santosa 2016). This study expects that the relationship academic integrity culture and intention will remain negative under Indonesia environment.…”

Section: Academic Integrity Culture and Intention To Conduct Academicmentioning

confidence: 95%

Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence

Winardi¹,

Mustikarini²,

Anggraeni³

2017

JAKI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic dishonesty among students has been recognised as a major concern in higher education in Indonesia. Accounting research arguably need to give more attention to this issue. This is partly because of the importance of integrity as part of accounting ethics and professionalism. However, little currently known about academic dishonesty among accounting students in Indonesia. We address this issue by surveying 342 accounting students about their perception of academic dishonesty and what motivates such behaviour. Our respondents were from all first, second or third year undergraduate students at one state university in Indonesia. Drawing from Theory of Planned Behaviour, we examine three individual variables-attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control. In addition, we also examine three situational variables-academic integrity culture, definitional ambiguity, and pressure. Six hypotheses were tested, using a Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling. The results reveal that 77.5% of respondents admitted committing academic dishonesty. While all individual factors studies have positive significant effect on the intention to commit academic dishonesty, of the three situational factors only pressure and definitional ambiguity have a positive significant effect. Surprisingly, it is found that academic integrity culture does not have a significant effect.

show abstract

Section: Academic Integrity Culture and Intention To Conduct Academicmentioning

confidence: 95%

Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence

Winardi¹,

Mustikarini²,

Anggraeni³

2017

JAKI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In response to this and subsequent national policy, Indonesian educational institutions have made efforts to address the plagiarism issue through prevention and mitigation (as reported in Adiningrum 2015;Adiningrum et al 2013;Siaputra 2013, Siaputra andSantosa 2015). Strategies introduced include workshops and dissemination of plagiarism information, statements on webpages, mandatory uploading of academic work to a database for Indonesian academic staff and students called Garba Rujukan Digital (Garuda) (Dikti 2011a) and validation of academic work through peer review by a specialised team in each institution before promotion of academic staff (Dikti 2011b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding plagiarism in Indonesia from the lens of plagiarism policy: lessons for universities

Akbar

Picard

2019

Int J Educ Integr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Plagiarism is viewed as a critical issue that can hinder the development of creativity and innovation in Indonesia. Thus, since the early 2000s the Indonesian government has endeavoured to develop policies to address this issue. In response to national policy, Indonesian educational institutions have made serious institutional efforts to address the plagiarism issue. Research in the Indonesian Higher education context on plagiarism has focussed on reporting prevention and mitigation efforts. However, little has been discussed about the communication of these efforts in policy across the different institutional levels of Indonesian Higher Education. This study aims at exploring the anti-plagiarism efforts by determining the main features (or discourses) reflected in plagiarism policy in Indonesian HE from national to institutional level. Two web-based resources namely the official website of The General Directorate of Research, Technology and Higher Education (retrieved 2015), and the website of Bandung Institute of Technology (retrieved 2015) were used to ascertain the most appropriate policies to include in the study. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used to reach explanatory understanding of how the policies (discursive events) demonstrate through their linguistic repetitions and other forms intertextuality, their relative positions within the Indonesian Higher Education institutional hierarchy and consequently provide some insight into the social practices and understandings of plagiarism underlying the creation of the documents. This study revealed that perhaps because of the rigid boundaries and hierarchies represented between the documents, the university policy does not show much transformation from the documents at a Ministry level, hence the definition of plagiarism remains broad and the levels of plagiarism and sanctions for plagiarism remain undefined. This can potentially lead to inconsistencies in developing effective practices preventing plagiarism.

show abstract

“…The modes of corruption that occur in university institutions include extra tuition fees for graduate student's courses, additional fees for activities of institutional visits, delay or absence of lecturers in lecture hours, extortion from faculty to students, the payment of administrative fees for borrowing books, and the maintenance of course grade and diplomas being legalized. Siaputra et al, (2015) examined the academic integrity of universities in Indonesia explicitly. Siaputra et al, (2015) found that the governance of a university was still marred by acts of academic violations committed by lecturers, invigilators, staff employees, and students.…”

Section: Corruption Practices In University Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Siaputra et al, (2015) examined the academic integrity of universities in Indonesia explicitly. Siaputra et al, (2015) found that the governance of a university was still marred by acts of academic violations committed by lecturers, invigilators, staff employees, and students.…”

Section: Corruption Practices In University Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indeed, the Indonesian government has been managing the university governance with integrity by implementing a number of regulations, namely: 1) Presidential Instruction number 9 of 1977 concerning Operation Control (1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981), tasked with cleaning up illegal levies, controlling stealth money, and regulating local government officials and the department; 2) The Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia number 87 of 2016 concerning the Net Sweep Task Force, promulgated on October 21, 2016; and 3) Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and University of the Republic of Indonesia number 350/M/Kemenristek/2016 concerning the Task Force for Clean Sweep of Illegal Levies in the Ministry of Research, Technology and University. However, the corruption practices in university governances run massively (Siaputra et al, 2015). Therefore, a model of integrity university governance needs to built by exploring university governance problems based on university stakeholder's perceptions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing Integrity University Governance Model in Indonesia

Salahudin

Nurmandi

Fajar³

et al. 2019

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to explain and design a model for university governance with integrity that is focused on the core and business processes of university organizations. NVivo applacation had been used in this research. This study revealed that universities have not shown governance with integrity. The colleges have not established the values of integrity as key content at the core of their business and the business processes of a university, namely education, research, society services, human resource management, budgeting, cooperation, infrastructure, and leadership. Furthermore, corruption practices in university governance have been widespread. Therefore, by using method of Strategic Analysis Surfacing and Testing (SAST), this paper also formulates a model of university governance with integrity that puts emphasis on strengthening the core and business processes of university organizations and strengthening the organizational values of university institutions including culture, norms, regulation, management, and organizational structure.

show abstract

Academic Integrity Campaign in Indonesia

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence

Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence

Understanding plagiarism in Indonesia from the lens of plagiarism policy: lessons for universities

Developing Integrity University Governance Model in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About