The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40979-021-00074-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic integrity at doctoral level: the influence of the imposter phenomenon and cultural differences on academic writing

Abstract: This conceptual review seeks to reframe the view of academic integrity as something to be enforced to an academic skill that needs to be developed. The authors highlight how practices within academia create an environment where feelings of inadequacy thrive, leading to behaviours of unintentional academic misconduct. Importantly, this review includes practical suggestions to help educators and higher education institutions support doctoral students’ academic integrity skills. In particular, the authors highlig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, negative feelings may emerge when students gain knowledge and then come to the realization that there are gaps in their understanding and that there are new things to learn. This finding may provide further evidence of a link between academic integrity and the imposter syndrome often felt by graduate students (Cutri et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, negative feelings may emerge when students gain knowledge and then come to the realization that there are gaps in their understanding and that there are new things to learn. This finding may provide further evidence of a link between academic integrity and the imposter syndrome often felt by graduate students (Cutri et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Students' and teachers' culture, political views and religious belief and practices can also influence their propensity to academic integrity (Akbar & Picard, 2020;Hongwei et al, 2017;Nelson et al, 2017). Cutri et al (2021) imply that an individual's "decisions and meaning making capacity" (p. 8) can be influenced and guided by their culture. Consequently, a plethora of studies pointed out that cultural barriers and differences put students at greater risk of academic malpractice (Campbell, 2017;Thompson et al, 2017, Velliaris & Breen, 2016, be it intentionally or unintentionally.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, supervisors might inculcate an integrity-centred career in research and publishing and deemphasise rank and position in an ECR's career of research and publishing (Pather & Remenyi, 2019). For the purpose of this paper, academic integrity in research is defined using the definition provided by Cutri et al (2021: 3): 'conducting research in a fair, respectful and honest manner, and reporting findings responsibly and honestly.' Yet, in reality, ECRs might encounter a playing field that consists of status quo indexed, ranked or metricised journals that are being gamed and driven by prestige and rewards (Hatch & Curry, 2020).…”
Section: Who Are Early Career Researchers and Why Does It Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%