1992
DOI: 10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the characteristics of knowledge flows from universities (research institutes) which are more tangible, explicit, and easily able to be leveraged by ACAP compared with the more applied knowledge and tacit know-how that flow directly between firms collaborating with one another (Quintas, Wield and Massey, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is mainly due to the characteristics of knowledge flows from universities (research institutes) which are more tangible, explicit, and easily able to be leveraged by ACAP compared with the more applied knowledge and tacit know-how that flow directly between firms collaborating with one another (Quintas, Wield and Massey, 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities and research institutes tend to focus on theoretical or fundamental research domains where the created knowledge may not be directly applicable to fit with the industry know-how (Simard and West, 2006) or specific organisational problems (Quintas, Wield and Massey, 1992). Thus for Chinese firms, the inadequacy of national innovation capabilities at a tertiary level, resulting from the era of a centrally planned economy, may lead to the limited absorption (Guan, Yam and Mok, 2005;Motohashi and Yun, 2007).…”
Section: Universities and Research Institutes (Uris)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SP literature appears to offer a useful set of conceptual tools in this regard for understanding how existing communities fit into new precincts (Hansson et al, 2005). This fits with the well-established point that those SPs which work best are those already embedded around strong and supportive knowledge communities able to exploit the new facilities Quintas et al, 1992). Nevertheless, we argue that more consideration needs to be given to these proximity-connectivity processes in KBUD conceptualisation, as well as an imperative to understanding how this dynamic within-city process in turn drives cross-city connectivity and ultimately upgrading effects, the latter stages of our figure 1 model.…”
Section: Incorporating Connectivity Effects In Kbud Theorymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the UK, the park building boom started in the 80s due to three principal causes; first, a strong investment in the construction of the parks and a reduction in research funding, undermining the very strengths which SPs sought to exploit. Second, as a policy initiative from the government to incentive the industrial resurgence and create job opportunities and thus overcome the severe recession and unemployment of 79-81 (Quintas, et al, 1992), and third, as a result of the transformation from polytechnic institutions into universities (Siegel, Westhead, & Wright, 2003a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%