2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic honors and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
61
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…( Twelve-month salaries of " low-level" administrators were typically de-annualized for estimation, and " higher-level" administrators were typically excluded.) Thus, outside professional income-e.g., from research grants, consulting, or book royalties-is not included (although Chan et al 2014b, show that in academe, generally the more heavily cited receive higher nonacademic earnings). To the extent that those who are more heavily cited obtain more than proportionate additional income from these sources, which seems likely, the estimated impacts of citations on salaries may understate their impacts on total professional income.…”
Section: Salariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Twelve-month salaries of " low-level" administrators were typically de-annualized for estimation, and " higher-level" administrators were typically excluded.) Thus, outside professional income-e.g., from research grants, consulting, or book royalties-is not included (although Chan et al 2014b, show that in academe, generally the more heavily cited receive higher nonacademic earnings). To the extent that those who are more heavily cited obtain more than proportionate additional income from these sources, which seems likely, the estimated impacts of citations on salaries may understate their impacts on total professional income.…”
Section: Salariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, in many instances publications, researchers, or institutions under investigation are not a random sample of the whole population of publications but highly selective. This particularly holds for studies on the causal effects of certain events, such as academic honors (e.g., Azoulay, Stuart, & Wang, ; Chan, Frey, Gallus, & Torgler, ) or scientific scandals (e.g., Azoulay, Furman, Krieger, & Murray, ; Lu, Jin, Uzzi, & Jones, ), on citation impact. Hence, a simple comparison of average citations received by Nobel Papers with citations of average papers in a field would be “naïve” (Morgan & Winship, , p. 44) as it assumes the absence of nonrandom selection into treatment (for a general discussion, see Imai, King, & Stuart, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies use a donor pool from other countries (Castañeda and Vargas, 2012;Billmeier and Nannicini, 2013;Abadie et al, 2015;Karlsson and Pichler, 2015;Smith, 2015), other regions within the same country (Abadie and Gardezabal, 2003;Abadie et al, 2010;Leight, 2010;Bohn et al, 2011Bohn et al, , 2015Coffman and Noy, 2011;Bassok et al, 2012;Dorsett, 2013;Hankins, 2014;Ando, 2015;Dietrichtson and Ellegard, 2015;Munasib and Rickman, 2015), or other districts within a region (Bauhoff, 2014). One study uses a donor pool consisting of other persons (Chan et al, 2015). However, as far as we know, other industries within the same country have never been used.…”
Section: Identification Data and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%