2012
DOI: 10.5406/radicalteacher.93.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Freedom in the Corporate University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of this can then extend to a decreasing level of collegiality, which particularly affects early-career academics who are more vulnerable to the termination of contracts and more concerned with surviving/thriving in competitive environments that emphasise the role of individual success over other priorities (Giroux, 2016;Schrecker, 2012). The introduction of managerialism may also lead to this potential decrease in collegiality, which according to Yokohama (2006) is at the opposite extreme of the same continuum, as it institutionalises competition among colleagues.…”
Section: Organisation Of Contemporary Academic Research: New Public Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of this can then extend to a decreasing level of collegiality, which particularly affects early-career academics who are more vulnerable to the termination of contracts and more concerned with surviving/thriving in competitive environments that emphasise the role of individual success over other priorities (Giroux, 2016;Schrecker, 2012). The introduction of managerialism may also lead to this potential decrease in collegiality, which according to Yokohama (2006) is at the opposite extreme of the same continuum, as it institutionalises competition among colleagues.…”
Section: Organisation Of Contemporary Academic Research: New Public Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these addressed a range of aspects of the topic, all can be identified with one of three broad approaches: first-hand accounts of violations of the author’s academic freedom (Gottfredson, 2010; Peterson-Overton, 2011); examinations of particular features of the topic, e.g. academic freedom as ‘thought-time’ (Noonan, 2015), but see also Andreescu (2009), Coetzee (2016), Orenstein and Stoll-Ron (2014), and Schrecker (2012); and lastly: rationales for academic freedom (Bernstein, 2008; Karran, 2009; Tierney and Lechuga, 2010).…”
Section: Preserving Academic Freedom: the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 6 of the 10 texts consider strategies for resisting the erosion of academic freedom: (Bernstein, 2008; Coetzee, 2016; Gottfredson, 2010; Karran, 2009; Peterson-Overton, 2011; Tierney and Lechuga, 2010). (Schrecker suggests that resistance is futile in proposing that ‘when they have not been passively acquiescing in their own marginalization, American professors have been fighting and losing a rearguard action against the structural changes of the past forty years that have undermined the power and autonomy of the faculty’ (Schrecker, 2012: 4).) In reporting on the more optimistic responses to the question of how academic freedom may be actively defended, I will start with sweeping calls-to-arms and progress to more specific propositions.…”
Section: Preserving Academic Freedom: the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is an entrenched bureaucracy, diminished collegiality and the abuse of vulnerable academics, in particular those who are early career, adjunct and/or casual laborers (Giroux, 2016;Osei-Kofi, 2012). Untenured scholars are especially impacted, as their capacity to confront irrational, uninformed or malicious decisions by an academic oligarchy is curtailed by fear of reprisal and/or the termination of their contracts (Schrecker, 2012). As faculty get silenced by the 'University Inc. ' (Washburn, 2005), disadvantaged students lose an important voice for advocacy against marginalization and vulnerability (Oleksiyenko, 2015).…”
Section: Editorial Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%