1990
DOI: 10.1080/03075079012331377491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
18

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
68
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin with general HE arrangements, which are closely related to the allocation of procedural autonomy (Berdahl, 1990) and balance of power between the state, university management, and the professoriate. Specifically, who bears the greatest thrust of decision-making, to what extent is decision-making driven by entrepreneurial considerations, and which actors assume the most significant controlling functions in HE?…”
Section: General He Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin with general HE arrangements, which are closely related to the allocation of procedural autonomy (Berdahl, 1990) and balance of power between the state, university management, and the professoriate. Specifically, who bears the greatest thrust of decision-making, to what extent is decision-making driven by entrepreneurial considerations, and which actors assume the most significant controlling functions in HE?…”
Section: General He Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, regulation is understood as a law that affects the university's freedom to operate. The law, among other things, defines the autonomy or the degree of freedom the university has to steer itself (see OECD, 2008;Jongbloed, 2004;EUA, 2010;Anderson & Johnson 1998;Ashby & Anderson 1966;Berdahl 1990;Verhoest et al, 2004). It is the relationship between the state and universities (Dill 2001;Ordorika 2003).…”
Section: Politicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various funding mechanisms by which the national governments make finance available to universities can be thus identified: output or performance based funding, targeted funding, competitive funding, etc. (Massy, 1996;Hauptman & Salmi, 2006;Williams, 1992:141 Berdahl (1990) to distinguish between procedural and substantive autonomy.…”
Section: Regulatory Agencies: External Regulations and Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haskell (1997), for example, finds that student evaluations of faculty members can seriously impinge on their academic freedom, leading teachers to lower their teaching and exam standards, lower their classroom requirements and adjusting courses to popular beliefs and notions. Berdahl (1990) criticises the introduction of competition as a method of quality control because it risks undermining the academic integrity of universities. 127.…”
Section: Concrete Partnership Accountability Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%