2016
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science

Abstract: A great deal of research within science and engineering education revolves around academic success and retention of science and engineering students. It is well known that South Africa is experiencing, for various reasons, an acute shortage of engineers. Therefore, we think it is important to understand the factors that contribute to attrition rates in university students, and engineering students in particular. The theoretical framework for the present study draws on self-regulation theory, with particular re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in self-efficacy beliefs between male students and female students was not significant. This finding is in accordance with the findings of the study by Sezgintürk and Sungur (2020) and Vogel and Human-Vogel (2016) where the results indicated non-significant gender differences concerning self-efficacy. But it contradicts with the study by Stoet and Geary (2018), which found that male students had higher self-efficacy than female students in science education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The difference in self-efficacy beliefs between male students and female students was not significant. This finding is in accordance with the findings of the study by Sezgintürk and Sungur (2020) and Vogel and Human-Vogel (2016) where the results indicated non-significant gender differences concerning self-efficacy. But it contradicts with the study by Stoet and Geary (2018), which found that male students had higher self-efficacy than female students in science education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Also, there was a significant relationship between the investment, substitution, the academic satisfaction aspects and the level of academic commitment, from the aspect of academic commitment with academic achievement. In the case of the relationship between academic commitment and academic achievement, this study is inconsistent with the study of Rorik Vogel and Human Vogel (2016) (Vogel & Human-Vogel, 2016) but it was in accordance with the studies of Goo and Maine, (2014); Moala, 2018; (Y.-g. Liao & Chen, 2014;Muala, 2018;Womack, 2016). The findings of the study by Mirring (2017) also showed no association between meaningful commitment and academic achievement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…The key reasons for this gender disparity in science education are said to be rooted in the different social roles of boys and girls in society, as well as persistant negative stereotypes for females (Steele 1997;Tindall and Hamil 2004) in science. However, there are some studies highlighting non-significant gender differences regarding self-efficacy and attitudes about ability in math and science classes (Kiran and Sungur 2012;Sezgintürk and Sungur 2020;Vogel and Human-Vogel 2016). In the field of language learning and technology use in a specific model like the FCM, self-efficacy and gender has not yet been investigated extensively.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%