2018
DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2018.1455548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic collaborations: Linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each possible answer was assigned a numeric value. The Skills Score was grouped as low (0-5), moderate (6)(7)(8)(9)(10), and excellent (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Qualtrics was used to administer the pre-and post-test.…”
Section: Information Fluency Skills Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each possible answer was assigned a numeric value. The Skills Score was grouped as low (0-5), moderate (6)(7)(8)(9)(10), and excellent (11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Qualtrics was used to administer the pre-and post-test.…”
Section: Information Fluency Skills Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For embedded librarians to be successful, they must have strong partnerships with course faculty members who are content experts [ 9 11 ]. The most successful partnerships result from respect and trust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies (Hemminger et al , 2007; Baer and Li, 2009; Niu et al , 2010; Engel et al , 2011; Tucci, 2011; Zhang, 2015) have assessed users' satisfaction with library resources and the quality of service provided and explored library use patterns, but few have actually covered the engineering field.…”
Section: Literature Review/backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the published papers on information literacy influence on collaboration among academics and students there was no practical application or consideration of Mackey and Jacobson's or Burke's models (Bruce et al, 2014;Dowling et al, 2018;Howard et al, 2018;Rosman et al, 2018;Subekti et al, 2018;Zanin-Yost, 2018).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%