2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40489-018-0141-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic and Related Skills Interventions for Autism: a 20-Year Systematic Review of Single-Case Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological rigor of each study was evaluated using one of the two rubrics developed by Reichow et al (2008): the single-case research (SCRD) rubric or the conventional group design rubric. These rubrics are regularly used in reviews of interventions for children and adolescents (e.g., Alresheed et al 2018;McLay et al 2019;Whalon et al 2015), are appropriate for use in both SCRD and group design studies, and provide operationalized definitions of key evaluation criteria. They were therefore considered appropriate for use within this review.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological rigor of each study was evaluated using one of the two rubrics developed by Reichow et al (2008): the single-case research (SCRD) rubric or the conventional group design rubric. These rubrics are regularly used in reviews of interventions for children and adolescents (e.g., Alresheed et al 2018;McLay et al 2019;Whalon et al 2015), are appropriate for use in both SCRD and group design studies, and provide operationalized definitions of key evaluation criteria. They were therefore considered appropriate for use within this review.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study was located that encompassed all STEM areas (Ehsan, Rispoli, Lory, & Gregori, 2018), three focused on mathematics (Barnett & Cleary, 2015;Gervarter, Bryant, Bryant, Watkins, Zamora, & Sammarco, 2016;King, Lemons, & Davidson, 2016). Three review literature publications focused on content-areas interventions (Alresheed, Machalicek, Sanford, & Bano, 2018;Spencer et al, 2014) including a focus on comprehension strategies in content areas (Knight & Sartini, 2015). In each of the three studies, over a quarter of the included original studies were STEM related (26%, 20%, 30%, respectfully).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All except one of these studies suggested evidence of a causal relation. Parents express a lack of proper academic adjustments for their children with ASD [42,[109][110][111], and previous research has mainly been conducted in segregated settings [112][113][114][115]. Clearly, it is now time to give more priority to research on pedagogical strategies in mainstream school.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%