Prominin-1 (CD133), a pentaspan membrane glycoprotein that constitutes an important cell surface marker of various, either normal or cancerous, stem cell populations is widely used to isolate or characterize such cells in different systems. Occurring throughout the metazoan evolution with a remarkably conserved genomic organization, it may be expressed as different splice variants with distinctive characteristics. A rational nomenclature has been proposed earlier for their consistent designation across species. Although generally accepted, it seems to be misunderstood in view of the recent report of novel prominin-1 complementary DNAs in rhesus monkey and humans with improper naming. As this may lead to confusion, we have reexamined the genomic organization of prominin-1 in various primates to provide an update that should further clarify the rationale of the nomenclature for prominin-1 gene products. This report comprises (i) the determination of the genomic organization of prominin-1 gene in two non-human primates, i.e. Macaca mulatta and Pan troglodytes, commonly used in research, (ii) the mapping of a new exon that creates an alternative cytoplasmic C-terminal end of prominin-1, (iii) the identification of various potential PDZ-binding domains generated by alternative cytoplasmic C-terminal tails, suggesting that different prominin-1 splice variants might interact with distinct protein partners, and (iv) a summing up of the different prominin-1 splice variants.In the article entitled ÔIsolation, molecular cloning and in vitro expression of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) prominin-1.s1 complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a potential hematopoietic stem cell antigenÕ, recently published in Tissue Antigens by Husain et al. (1), the authors refer to a previous article from our group proposing a unifying nomenclature for the designation of the prominin family gene products (2) based on their conserved genomic organization across species (3, 4). The aim of this nomenclature was to attribute the same designation to a given splice variant irrespective of the species as splice variants described in one organism could be predicted to exist in others, with similar characteristics at least among mammals. This nomenclature seems to be generally accepted in the field (5-9), but the rationale underlying it may remain unclear as the rhesus prominin-1 splice variant described by Husain et al. does not correspond to the s1 splice variant (1), and several unpublished human prominin-1 splice variants appear in the NCBI GenBank database (accession numbers AY449690 to AY449693) with the incorrect suffix according to this same nomenclature. Given the wide use of prominin-1 (also termed CD133) for the characterization of stem and progenitor cell populations in different normal tissues (10-13) as well as in cancers [(14-16); for review, see (17)], it is important to clarify the rationale of this nomenclature. We believe that it is essential to maintain a consistent designation with regard to potential cross-specificity toward pa...