2020
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abuse, self-harm and suicidal ideation in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: Summary This study explored patterns of abuse, self-harm and thoughts of suicide/self-harm in the UK during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic using data from the COVID-19 Social Study (n=44 775), a non-probability sample weighted to population proportions. The reported frequency of abuse, self-harm and thoughts of suicide/self-harm was higher among women, Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) groups and people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, unemployment, disability, chronic physical illne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
261
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(14 reference statements)
14
261
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These increases were greater in the younger age groups, and for women. This pattern of results has been replicated by other studies that occurred in the early phase of the pandemic [e.g., (10)(11)(12)] and have been extended to show high levels of thoughts of self-harm and suicide in the first month of the lockdown in the UK (13) with, again, a higher incidence rate for women.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These increases were greater in the younger age groups, and for women. This pattern of results has been replicated by other studies that occurred in the early phase of the pandemic [e.g., (10)(11)(12)] and have been extended to show high levels of thoughts of self-harm and suicide in the first month of the lockdown in the UK (13) with, again, a higher incidence rate for women.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In the UK, for the most vulnerable, a period of 'social shielding', avoiding face-to-face contact has been advised, 3 4 with twin aims of protecting individuals from infection and avoiding a peak of cases in the most vulnerable, which might overwhelm the health and social care system. Measures to reduce the immediate impact of COVID-19 are likely to have some adverse consequences for the population's health and well-being, [5][6][7][8] leading to a so called 'third wave' of COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality in which detrimental health impacts for people with long-term conditions result from interruptions to care provision and health-seeking behaviours. 9 This is of particular concern given the substantial level of unmet need related to respiratory disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data also should include information from both the pre-COVID-19 period (to serve as the baseline samples) and the post-COVID-19 period. However, existing studies use readily available and convenient data that could easily generate biased insights: most studies rely on some measures on suicidality rather than suicide mortality [19][20][21][22][23][24] . Some compare suicidal behaviors using snapshot data during the pandemic with a lack of the pre-pandemic baseline samples 19,20,22,23 ; while others compare the whole suicide or suicidality trend before and after the pandemic, which might capture common time trend, seasonality, or temporal time shocks across individuals 21,24,25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%