Abstract:Rationale
GABAA Positive Allosteric Modulators (GABAA PAMs), such as diazepam and zolpidem, are used clinically for anxiety and insomnia, but abuse-liability is a concern. Novel GABAA PAMS may have lower abuse-liability while retaining clinical utility.
Objective
The present study compared abuse-related effects of the nonselective GABAA PAM diazepam, the α1-selective GABAA PAM zolpidem, and three novel GABAA PAMs (JY-XHe-053, XHe-II-053, and HZ-166) using intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rats. These n… Show more
“…This observation raises the possibility that compounds with zero or relatively lower α1GABA A intrinsic efficacy may have reduced reinforcing effects. Importantly, these findings are consistent with a recent report by Schwienteck et al (2017) using ICSS procedures in rats, in which compounds with differing degrees of functional selectivity for α2/3GABA A receptors produced less facilitation of ICSS thresholds than diazepam, suggesting lower abuse liability than associated with a conventional benzodiazepine.…”
Background: In recent years, pharmacological strategies have implicated α3 subunit-containing GABAA (α3GABAA) receptor subtypes in the anxiety-reducing effects of benzodiazepines, whereas transgenic mouse approaches have implicated α2 or α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Aims: We investigated the role of α3GABAA subtypes in benzodiazepine-induced behaviors by evaluating the anti-conflict, reinforcing, and sedative-motor effects of the novel compound YT-III-31, which has functional selectivity for α3GABAA receptors. Methods: Female and male rhesus monkeys were trained under a conflict procedure ( n = 3), and a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement with midazolam as the training drug ( n = 4). Sedative-like behavior was assessed using a quantitative behavioral observation procedure ( n = 4). A range of doses of YT-III-31 was administered in all tests using the i.v. route of administration. Results: In the conflict procedure, increasing doses of YT-III-31 resulted only in dose-dependent attenuation of non-suppressed responding. In the progressive-ratio model of self-administration, YT-III-31 maintained average injections/session above vehicle levels at 0.1 and 0.18 mg/kg/injection. In quantitative observation procedures, YT-III-31 engendered mild sedative effects (“rest/sleep posture”), and deep sedation at the highest dose tested (5.6 mg/kg, i.v.), along with a suppression of tactile/oral exploration and increased observable ataxia. In contrast to other benzodiazepine-like ligands, YT-III-31 uniquely engendered a biphasic dose-response function for locomotion and suppressed self-groom. Conclusions: The finding that YT-III-31 lacked anti-conflict properties is in accordance with transgenic mouse research indicating no role for α3GABAA subtypes in benzodiazepine-mediated anxiety reduction. Instead, our results raise the possibility of a role for α3GABAA receptors in the abuse potential and sedative effects of benzodiazepine-type drugs.
“…This observation raises the possibility that compounds with zero or relatively lower α1GABA A intrinsic efficacy may have reduced reinforcing effects. Importantly, these findings are consistent with a recent report by Schwienteck et al (2017) using ICSS procedures in rats, in which compounds with differing degrees of functional selectivity for α2/3GABA A receptors produced less facilitation of ICSS thresholds than diazepam, suggesting lower abuse liability than associated with a conventional benzodiazepine.…”
Background: In recent years, pharmacological strategies have implicated α3 subunit-containing GABAA (α3GABAA) receptor subtypes in the anxiety-reducing effects of benzodiazepines, whereas transgenic mouse approaches have implicated α2 or α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. Aims: We investigated the role of α3GABAA subtypes in benzodiazepine-induced behaviors by evaluating the anti-conflict, reinforcing, and sedative-motor effects of the novel compound YT-III-31, which has functional selectivity for α3GABAA receptors. Methods: Female and male rhesus monkeys were trained under a conflict procedure ( n = 3), and a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement with midazolam as the training drug ( n = 4). Sedative-like behavior was assessed using a quantitative behavioral observation procedure ( n = 4). A range of doses of YT-III-31 was administered in all tests using the i.v. route of administration. Results: In the conflict procedure, increasing doses of YT-III-31 resulted only in dose-dependent attenuation of non-suppressed responding. In the progressive-ratio model of self-administration, YT-III-31 maintained average injections/session above vehicle levels at 0.1 and 0.18 mg/kg/injection. In quantitative observation procedures, YT-III-31 engendered mild sedative effects (“rest/sleep posture”), and deep sedation at the highest dose tested (5.6 mg/kg, i.v.), along with a suppression of tactile/oral exploration and increased observable ataxia. In contrast to other benzodiazepine-like ligands, YT-III-31 uniquely engendered a biphasic dose-response function for locomotion and suppressed self-groom. Conclusions: The finding that YT-III-31 lacked anti-conflict properties is in accordance with transgenic mouse research indicating no role for α3GABAA subtypes in benzodiazepine-mediated anxiety reduction. Instead, our results raise the possibility of a role for α3GABAA receptors in the abuse potential and sedative effects of benzodiazepine-type drugs.
“…Consistent with its effectiveness to treat many types of clinical pain and to alleviate other examples of IP acid-induced behavioral depression in rodents, the positive control NSAID analgesic ketoprofen fully blocked IP acid-induced depression of both crosses and movement at doses that had no effect on these endpoints when ketoprofen was administered alone (35,46,47,51). By contrast, the negative controls diazepam, U69593, and psilocybin produced dose-dependent behavioral depression when administered alone consistent with other evidence for their motor effects (51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), and lower doses that did not impair motor function failed to alleviate IP acid-induced behavioral depression. These findings imply that diazepam, U69593, and psilocybin either do not produce analgesia or do so only at doses equal to or above those that produce motor impairment.…”
Section: Drug Effects On Ip Acid-induced Behavioral Depressionsupporting
IntroductionIntermediate efficacy mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists have potential to retain analgesic effectiveness while improving safety, but the optimal MOR efficacy for effective and safe opioid analgesia is unknown. Preclinical assays of pain-depressed behavior can assess effects of opioids and other candidate analgesics on pain-related behavioral depression, which is a common manifestation of clinically relevant pain and target of pain treatment. Accordingly, the present study goal was to validate a novel assay of pain-depressed locomotor behavior in mice and evaluate the role of MOR efficacy as a determinant of opioid analgesic effects and related safety measures.MethodsMale and female ICR mice were tested in a locomotor chamber consisting of 2 compartments connected by a doorway that contained a 1-inch-tall barrier. Dependent measures during 15-min behavioral sessions included crosses between compartments (which required vertical activity to surmount the barrier) and total movement counts (which required horizontal activity to break photobeams in each compartment).Results and DiscussionIntraperitoneal injection of lactic acid (IP acid) produced a concentration- and time-dependent depression of both endpoints. Optimal blockade of IP acid-induced behavioral depression with minimal motor impairment was achieved with intermediate-efficacy MOR treatments that also produced less gastrointestinal-transit inhibition and respiratory depression than the high-efficacy MOR agonist fentanyl. Sex differences in treatment effects were rare. Overall, these findings validate a novel procedure for evaluating opioids and other candidate analgesic effects on pain-related behavioral depression in mice and support continued research with intermediate-efficacy MOR agonists as a strategy to retain opioid analgesic effectiveness with improved safety.
“…According to currently applicable clinical practice guidelines (e.g., National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, 2011 ; Bandelow et al, 2012 ; Baldwin et al, 2014 ), recommended pharmacological treatments for anxiety disorders include antidepressant drugs such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, sedative-hypnotic drugs such as benzodiazepines, and pregabalin. Benzodiazepines and pregabalin in particular have been associated with abuse potential and dependence based on clinical observations and through their mechanisms of action (e.g., Nothdurfter et al, 2012 ; Baldwin et al, 2013 ; Engin et al, 2014 ; Schjerning et al, 2016 ; Schwienteck et al, 2017 ). Silexan may thus be an interesting therapeutic option for the pharmacotherapy of anxiety-related disorders.…”
Background
Silexan is a lavender essential oil with established anxiolytic and calming efficacy. Here we asked whether there is a potential for abuse in human patients.
Methods
We carried out a phase I abuse liability single-center, double-blind, 5-way crossover study in healthy users of recreational central nervous system depressants. They received single oral doses of 80 mg (therapeutic dose) and 640 mg Silexan, 2 mg and 4 mg lorazepam (active control) and placebo in randomized order, with 4- to 14-day washout periods between treatments. Pharmacodynamic measures included validated visual analogue scales assessing positive, negative, and sedative drug effects and balance of effects; a short form of the Addiction Research Center Inventory; and a drug similarity assessment. The primary outcome measure was the individual maximum value on the drug liking visual analogue scale during 24 hours post-dose.
Results
Forty participants were randomized and 34 were evaluable for pharmacodynamic outcomes. In intraindividual head-to-head comparisons of the drug liking visual analogue scale maximum value, both doses of Silexan were rated similar to placebo whereas differences were observed between Silexan and lorazepam and between placebo and lorazepam (P < .001). These data were supported by all secondary measures of positive drug effects and of balance of effects. Differences between placebo and both doses of Silexan were always negligible in magnitude. Moreover, Silexan showed no sedative effects and was not perceived to be similar to commonly used drugs that participants had used in the past.
Conclusions
Silexan did not exhibit any abuse potential in a standard abuse potential detection screen study and is unlikely to be recreationally abused.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.