2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance scaling in stars, nebulae and galaxies

Abstract: We present a new basis for scaling abundances with total metallicity in nebular photoionisation models, based on extensive Milky Way stellar abundance data, to replace the uniform scaling normally used in the analysis of H ii regions. Our goal is to provide a single scaling method and local abundance reference standard for use in nebular modelling and its key inputs, the stellar atmosphere and evolutionary track models. We introduce a parametric enrichment factor, ζ, to describe how atomic abundances scale wit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
124
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is limited knowledge on how iron abundances relative to α−element (e.g, O, Mg, Si, S and Ca) abundance change over cosmic time and in different galactic environments (eg., Wolfe et al 2005;Kobayashi et al 2006;Yuan et al 2015). In addition, there is a lack of consistency in abundance scale used in stellar atmosphere modelling, stellar evolutionary tracks and nebular models (Nicholls et al 2016 (2016), then we would reach the same conclusion as Steidel et al (2016) that our stellar abundance is [Fe/H] ∼ −1.0. In this case, we cannot completely rule out extremely low metallicity scenarios to explain the distribution of galaxies in the Hα EW vs [340] − [550] colour space.…”
Section: Stellar Metallicitysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Second, there is limited knowledge on how iron abundances relative to α−element (e.g, O, Mg, Si, S and Ca) abundance change over cosmic time and in different galactic environments (eg., Wolfe et al 2005;Kobayashi et al 2006;Yuan et al 2015). In addition, there is a lack of consistency in abundance scale used in stellar atmosphere modelling, stellar evolutionary tracks and nebular models (Nicholls et al 2016 (2016), then we would reach the same conclusion as Steidel et al (2016) that our stellar abundance is [Fe/H] ∼ −1.0. In this case, we cannot completely rule out extremely low metallicity scenarios to explain the distribution of galaxies in the Hα EW vs [340] − [550] colour space.…”
Section: Stellar Metallicitysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These models are applied to the study of Herbig-Haro (HH) objects in the second paper in this series (Dopita & Sutherland, 2017: in press). -The X-ray and Ionising efficiency factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This much improved MAPPINGS V code 2 will be discussed in detail in a forthcoming paper (Sutherland & Dopita, 2017) which provides new cooling function computations for optically thin plasmas. This is based on greatly expanded atomic data of the CHIANTI 8 database.…”
Section: The Mappings Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our nebular models, we adopt the solar reference abundances of Anders & Grevesse (1989), corresponding to a solar value of Z = 0.020 ≡ 12 + log(O/H) = 8.93. Abundances at other metallicities of Z = 0.001, Z = 0.004, Z = 0.008, and Z = 0.040 are obtained by applying the Local Galactic Concordance (LGC) abundance scaling prescription described by Nicholls et al (2017). Typically nebular models adopt a linear scaling for abundances with metallicity, with the exception of a few elements (e.g.…”
Section: Abundance Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abundances account for the nonlinear scaling of alpha elements (including oxygen) with iron and account for primary and secondary production mechanisms for carbon and nitrogen. The variation with O/H of several elements, such as C, N, and Fe, is shown in Nicholls et al (2017). We note that this abundance scale is calibrated from MW stellar abundances and may not be appropriate for dwarf galaxies or galaxies with instantaneous SFHs (see Nicholls et al 2017, for a detailed explanation of abundance scaling with metallicity).…”
Section: Abundance Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%