2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance, production and stabilization of microbial biomass under conventional and reduced tillage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
8
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In arable soils, the fungal cell-membrane component ergosterol is an important index for saprotrophic fungi (Joergensen and Wichern 2008;van Groenigen et al 2010). However, the increase in ergosterol is probably not caused by the Table 6 Mean ratios of microbial biomass C/N, ergosterol/ microbial biomass C, and microbial biomass C/soil organic C in the soil of the fertilization trial (n=19 for non-amended area, n=6 for all fertilizer treatments, n=4 for all plots), probability values of a two-way ANOVA using treatment and plots as factors, comparing vegetal fertilizers and farmyard manure (FYM) application and comparing inorganic fertilizer with all organic fertilizer treatments CV pooled coefficient of variation between within plots (n=4), NS not significant CV pooled coefficient of variation between replicate plots (n=6), NS not significant, FW fresh weight of saleable tubers, DW dry weight vegetal fertilizers but by straw incorporation roughly 6 months before soil sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In arable soils, the fungal cell-membrane component ergosterol is an important index for saprotrophic fungi (Joergensen and Wichern 2008;van Groenigen et al 2010). However, the increase in ergosterol is probably not caused by the Table 6 Mean ratios of microbial biomass C/N, ergosterol/ microbial biomass C, and microbial biomass C/soil organic C in the soil of the fertilization trial (n=19 for non-amended area, n=6 for all fertilizer treatments, n=4 for all plots), probability values of a two-way ANOVA using treatment and plots as factors, comparing vegetal fertilizers and farmyard manure (FYM) application and comparing inorganic fertilizer with all organic fertilizer treatments CV pooled coefficient of variation between within plots (n=4), NS not significant CV pooled coefficient of variation between replicate plots (n=6), NS not significant, FW fresh weight of saleable tubers, DW dry weight vegetal fertilizers but by straw incorporation roughly 6 months before soil sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have reported similar responses. van Groenigen et al (2010) found no differences in the growth of AM fungi or saprotrophic fungi due to differences in tillage, and Denef et al (2009), reported that differences in mowing frequency (not soil disturbance, but still disturbance) did not alter 13 C enrichment in AM fungi. This is interesting given that AM fungal taxa shifts due to soil disturbance in agricultural areas have been observed by others (Castillo et al 2006;Jansa et al 2002Jansa et al , 2003, as well as in the specific area of this study (Schnoor et al 2011).…”
Section: Am Fungal Biomassmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Disturbance may also lead to shifts in the balance between different functional groups of fungi. van Groenigen et al (2010) found that reduced tillage increased the abundance of AM fungal and saprotrophic fungal lipids in shallow soil layers, but that AM fungi responded positively to reduced tillage at deeper soil layers too. Wortmann et al (2008) showed that AM fungi decreased in response to one-time tillage and the amount of saprotrophic fungi actually increased, and that the effects persisted for at least 3 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil CO 2 flux and microbial communities likely share common factors that control their variability over time (Helgason et al 2010). Soil microorganisms largely mediate the effect of management practices on the flow of C through ecosystems (van Groenigen et al 2010). Interactions between soil microbial biomass and the substrate supply determine the rate of CO 2 production and C sequestration in soil under similar environmental conditions (Wang et al 2003).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Leo Condronmentioning
confidence: 99%