1999
DOI: 10.1086/311788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance Modification by the Diamagnetic Effect

Abstract: Abundances of elements with first ionization potential (FIP) less than 10 eV in the corona and solar wind are augmented relative to the solar photosphere. This enhancement has been found to be independent of both mass and charge. We emphasize two facts that are relevant to this problem: (1) Only elements with eV are FIP ! 10 already ionized in the chromosphere, while in the corona, all elements are ionized. (2) It is known that diverging magnetic field structures anchored in the photosphere pass to the chromos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomalies are widely know as the "" FIP e †ect ÏÏ because they appear to relate primarily to the Ðrst ionization potential (FIP) of elements, low FIP eV) elements being ([10 enhanced relative to high FIP eV) elements by (Z10 varying amounts but with average enhancements factors of about 3È4. The FIP e †ect remains somewhat of a mystery, and, while several plausible explanations have been put forward (e.g., Feldman 1992 ;Meyer 1996 ;Peter & Eckart 1998 ;Steinitz & Kuno † 1999), there are as yet no widely accepted models to explain the variety of observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomalies are widely know as the "" FIP e †ect ÏÏ because they appear to relate primarily to the Ðrst ionization potential (FIP) of elements, low FIP eV) elements being ([10 enhanced relative to high FIP eV) elements by (Z10 varying amounts but with average enhancements factors of about 3È4. The FIP e †ect remains somewhat of a mystery, and, while several plausible explanations have been put forward (e.g., Feldman 1992 ;Meyer 1996 ;Peter & Eckart 1998 ;Steinitz & Kuno † 1999), there are as yet no widely accepted models to explain the variety of observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%