2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9730-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and habitat preferences of the southernmost population of mink: implications for managing a recent island invasion

Abstract: Since 2001 invasive American mink has been known to populate Navarino Island, an island located in the pristine wilderness of the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile, lacking native carnivorous mammals. As requested by scientists and managers, our study aims at understanding the population ecology of mink in order to respond to conservation concerns. We studied the abundance of mink in different semi-aquatic habitats using live trapping (n = 1,320 trap nights) and sign surveys (n = 68 sites). With generalized l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the apparent avoidance of beaver‐modified habitat by mink reported from Patagonia (Schüttler et al. ) and Russia (Kiseleva ) is interesting and, if this pattern is translated to Scotland, could have important implications for the future strategic management of mink.…”
Section: Review Of the Impacts Of Beavers On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the apparent avoidance of beaver‐modified habitat by mink reported from Patagonia (Schüttler et al. ) and Russia (Kiseleva ) is interesting and, if this pattern is translated to Scotland, could have important implications for the future strategic management of mink.…”
Section: Review Of the Impacts Of Beavers On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuentes: (1) Arróniz-Crespo et al 2014;Jofre et al 2010, Lewis et al 2014aMéndez, 2013;Méndez et al 2013;Rozzi et al 2008b; (2) Mansilla et al 2012Mansilla et al , 2013aMansilla et al , 2014aOjeda et al 2014Ojeda et al , 2015; (3) Contador et al 2012Contador et al , 2014; (4) Merino et al 2008;Reyes et al 2015;(5) Crego et al 2014(5) Crego et al , 2015Ibarra et al 2009Ibarra et al , 2010Schüttler et al 2008Schüttler et al , 2009Schüttler et al , 2010Schüttler et al , 2011Jiménez et al 2014;(6) Berghöfer et al 2008(6) Berghöfer et al , 2010Jax & Rozzi, 2004;Rozzi & Schüttler, 2013;Rozzi, 2004, Rozzi et al 2006a,b, 2007, 2012a; (7) Aguirre, 2015; Ibarra et al 2012;Massardo et al 2012;Poole et al 2013;Rozzi 2012aRozzi ,b, 2013Rozzi et al 2010bRozzi et al ,c, 2014Rozzi et al , 2015(8) Medina, 2013;Pizarro & Caballero, 2011;Sherriffs et al 2005;Zárraga et a...…”
Section: Programa De Investigación Transdisciplinaria Del Parque Etnounclassified
“…These indirect methods include, but are not limited to, sign surveys [6,7]; of which scat (fecal pellet) survey is one of the oldest and most widely used indirect methods [8,9]. More specifically, scat surveys are often used to determine habitat preferences and predict habitat quality (e.g., [10,11]) and are thus commonly used for monitoring endangered wildlife [12] or managing game species [13]. However, variability of both scat detectability and decay rate has led to the expression of concerns regarding the reliability of such surveys [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%