2015
DOI: 10.2192/ursus-d-14-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and density estimation of the American black bear population in central Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black bear density was highest on the east coast in pocosin, which is characterized by high food production and cover, low human disturbance, and agricultural food resources mixed throughout (Tredick and Vaughan , Drewry et al ). Eastern populations inhabiting pine plantations were at densities comparable to New Mexico populations likely because pine plantations had limited food, insufficient cover, and fewer agricultural food resources as compared to pocosin (Tredick and Vaughan , Drewry et al , Hooker et al ). Locally, our estimates are similar to or lower than those in southern Colorado, USA, and similar to or higher than those in northern Colorado (Table ); however, estimates for southern Colorado fluctuated substantially within each study area and over multiple years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black bear density was highest on the east coast in pocosin, which is characterized by high food production and cover, low human disturbance, and agricultural food resources mixed throughout (Tredick and Vaughan , Drewry et al ). Eastern populations inhabiting pine plantations were at densities comparable to New Mexico populations likely because pine plantations had limited food, insufficient cover, and fewer agricultural food resources as compared to pocosin (Tredick and Vaughan , Drewry et al , Hooker et al ). Locally, our estimates are similar to or lower than those in southern Colorado, USA, and similar to or higher than those in northern Colorado (Table ); however, estimates for southern Colorado fluctuated substantially within each study area and over multiple years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovations in non‐invasive genetic sampling techniques (NGS; Woods et al ), coupled with robust statistical analyses such as spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR; Efford ), have provided researchers with improved tools to estimate the abundance and density of carnivore populations from which harvest limits can be established. These tools have facilitated monitoring efforts and produced density estimates for black bear populations across much of their range (Stetz et al , Hooker et al , Sun et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Hooker et al. ). With lower detectability, it becomes more difficult to achieve adequate sample size for density estimation (Sun et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once defined, these habitat features or geographical boundaries could be used in the habitat mask feature of secr . Detection parameters could be modeled with these covariates to exclude nonhabitat areas, improve density estimates, and reduce probable underestimation in future surveys (Efford and Fewster , Hooker et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%