2004
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ABT492 and levofloxacin: comparison of their pharmacodynamics and their abilities to prevent the selection of resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model

Abstract: Overall, these findings predict greater efficacy of clinically achievable AUC/MIC (or AUC24/MIC) of ABT492 both in terms of the anti-staphylococcal effect and prevention of the selection of resistant mutants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With each of three clinical isolates, the maximal amplification of mutants resistant to 4ϫ, 8ϫ, and 16ϫ MIC of ciprofloxacin was observed when antibiotic concentrations fell into the MSW for most of the dosing interval, and both AUC 24 /MIC and AUC 24 /MPC relationships with resistance expressed by the population analysis data (AUBC M ) or susceptibility testing (ratio of the postexposure MIC to preexposure MIC) were bell shaped. These observations are consistent with earlier findings reported in studies with fluoroquinolones (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With each of three clinical isolates, the maximal amplification of mutants resistant to 4ϫ, 8ϫ, and 16ϫ MIC of ciprofloxacin was observed when antibiotic concentrations fell into the MSW for most of the dosing interval, and both AUC 24 /MIC and AUC 24 /MPC relationships with resistance expressed by the population analysis data (AUBC M ) or susceptibility testing (ratio of the postexposure MIC to preexposure MIC) were bell shaped. These observations are consistent with earlier findings reported in studies with fluoroquinolones (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Using these models, bell-shaped relationships have been established between the emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones and the ratios of 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC 24 ) to the MIC (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Such relationships have been reported with moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, the investigational fluoroquinolone ABÒ492, pazufloxacin, tosufloxacin, and garenoxacin against Staphylococcus aureus (6)(7)(8)(14)(15)(16); moxifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae (12,13); garenoxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (15); ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11,12); and ciprofloxacin, marbofloxacin, and enrofloxacin against Escherichia coli (9,10,17). In some of these studies (6-15, 17, 18), changes in susceptibility of antibiotic-exposed bacteria and/or their enrichment with resistant mutants was observed at fluoroquinolone concentrations above the MIC but below the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), i.e., inside the mutant selection window (MSW) but not outside the MSW, in accordance with the MSW hypothesis (19,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 5 years, this phenomenon has been studied intensively in vitro by using dynamic models; the results of these studies have recently been reviewed and discussed in detail elsewhere (9). Previously reported complex relationships between the enrichment of resistant mutants and in vitro-simulated pharmacokinetics of fluoroquinolones (5)(6)(7)16) and glycopeptides (8) support the hypothesis of the mutant selection window (MSW) (14). Based on these studies, both mutant selection and the concomitant loss in susceptibility depend on the simulated ratio of area under the curve (AUC) to the MIC in a bell-shaped manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these studies, both mutant selection and the concomitant loss in susceptibility depend on the simulated ratio of area under the curve (AUC) to the MIC in a bell-shaped manner. Together with AUC/MIC, the time inside MSW (T MSW ) has been proposed as a predictor of resistance (5), although it appeared to be less predictive of the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant and, especially, glycopeptide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus than was the AUC/ MIC ratio (1,(6)(7)(8)12). This observation might be attributed to the fact that T MSW does not consider the position of simulated antibiotic concentrations within the MSW, which also might influence the amplification of resistant mutants (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument has been mostly tested in in vitro studies for fluoroquinolones where the mutant-restrictive thresholds of AUC0-24/MPC were approximately one-third of those AUC0-24/MIC values [436,460].…”
Section: Mutant Prevention Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%