absurdity of reconciliation.

Abstract

The quest for reconciliation in South Africa is an exercise in the absurd. To say it is an exercise for the absurd might also have some merit. Like Sisyphus, the figure in Greek mythology, those engaged in the quest for reconciliation are condemned to repeat forever the same, in some cases, meaningless task of pushing a boulder up a mountain only to see it roll down again. This is amid the human propensity to forever search for meaning irrespective of the incongruity of the ideal and the absurdity that defines our existence. The illogicality of apartheid and the subsequent pain and alienation continues to be a defining feature of a country trying to come to terms not what it ought to be, but what it is – chaotic, irrational and sometimes meaningless. In this context, Rustenburg is a symbol of the audacity to dream of something beyond the absurd. Moreover, invoking a theology of reconciliation to achieve something extraordinary amid an uncertain future.

Reconstructing the history of doing Systematic Theology at UWC

“…Juxtaposing these soteriological concepts with each other explains why there emerged considerable interest in Gustaf Aulén's typology on atonement at UWC (see Jansen 2008, Festus 2008, Agyarko 2010, Brooks 2015, Kondolo 2016, Solomons 2017 as well as two monographs (2013,2015). 36 See especially Cloete 2014Cloete , 2021Conradie 2017 This is an envisaged series of twelve edited volumes on various aspects of the content and significance of the Christian faith.…”

By another's death?

“…More recently, Solomons has approached reconciliation as an "absurdity" (cf. Solomons, 2020b) and "a wicked problem" (cf. Solomons, 2020a), by which he means "something that is either too difficult or nearly impossible to resolve" (2020a:198).…”