2001
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstractionist and Processing Accounts of Implicit Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the face of it, this is at odds with the results of previous studies, which have indicated that explicit learning is more efficient than implicit learning for simple materials. However, the simple structures used in those studies were less complex than the simplest grammar in the present study (dependencies involving one element [Lee, 1995] vs. two; 4 rules [Johnstone & Shanks, 2001;Mathews et al, 1989] vs. 20). This suggests that it would have been possible to observe an effect of complexity on explicit learning if the present study had included even simpler grammars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the face of it, this is at odds with the results of previous studies, which have indicated that explicit learning is more efficient than implicit learning for simple materials. However, the simple structures used in those studies were less complex than the simplest grammar in the present study (dependencies involving one element [Lee, 1995] vs. two; 4 rules [Johnstone & Shanks, 2001;Mathews et al, 1989] vs. 20). This suggests that it would have been possible to observe an effect of complexity on explicit learning if the present study had included even simpler grammars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…(1989) showed that although a finite state grammar could be learned by performing a memorize task, a rule search task produced better results with a biconditional grammar. Johnstone and Shanks (2001) replicated this finding and suggested that the different results for the two types of grammar are due to differences in complexity. They argued that biconditional grammars are less complex than finite state grammars, since they consist of a smaller number of rules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider the explicit-implicit dimension. The theory assumes that, in the first stage, learning mostly occurs through explicit instruction; however, there is ample evidence in a variety of domains that skills are sometimes Expert Intuition in Nursing 10 learned implicitly, without the mediation of verbal instruction (Johnstone & Shanks, 2001;Reber, 1993). Thus, the theory is at best incomplete on this issue.…”
Section: Weaknesses Of the Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have contested this assertion, suggesting instead that the learning that takes place is more superficial and/or more conscious in nature. For example, Johnstone and Shanks (2001) and Wright and Whittlesea (1998) argue that people do not distinguish grammatical from nongrammatical stimuli, but perform in ways that are consistent with the demands of the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%