1998
DOI: 10.1109/12.656068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction techniques for validation coverage analysis and test generation

Abstract: The enormous state spaces which must be searched when verifying the correctness of, or generating tests for complex circuits, precludes the use of traditional approaches. Di cult and hard-to-nd abstractions are often required to simplify the circuits and make the problems tractable. This paper presents a simple and automatic method to extract the control ow of a circuit so that the resulting manageable state space can be explored for validation coverage analysis and automatic test generation. This control ow, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without using functional equivalence of redundant faults, Abramovici et al [8] proposed a method to identify redundant stuck-at faults using controllability and observability. Another study [9] proposed a method that could represent a control flow of a design as a finite-state machine while not specifically targeting redundant fault identificaCopyright ction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without using functional equivalence of redundant faults, Abramovici et al [8] proposed a method to identify redundant stuck-at faults using controllability and observability. Another study [9] proposed a method that could represent a control flow of a design as a finite-state machine while not specifically targeting redundant fault identificaCopyright ction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researches give a lot of attention to extraction controller from datapath (Moundanos et al, 1998;Ho et al, 1995) and verifying the controller part only. Though, the introduced techniques are not capable to deal with big designs efficiently because the ability of separating controller form datapath depends on assigning specific labels Science Publications JCS manually.…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,20] use binary decision diagrams (BDDs) to represent EFSMs and describe symbolic approaches to test generation for state and transition coverage criteria. [14] describes a test generation method by adapting local or on-the-fly model checking algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%