2015 IEEE 33rd VLSI Test Symposium (VTS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vts.2015.7116286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction-based relation mining for functional test generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the search spaces of hybrid concrete and symbolic simulation techniques such as [17] and [25] are bounded to a few tens of cycles due to computational complexity, albeit far superior to traditional static symbolic execution. On the other hand, stochastic or heuristically guided search-based techniques [20,14] are often faster than semi-formal techniques and have the potential to explore a larger search space, but usually, end up producing relatively larger tests to meet similar goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the search spaces of hybrid concrete and symbolic simulation techniques such as [17] and [25] are bounded to a few tens of cycles due to computational complexity, albeit far superior to traditional static symbolic execution. On the other hand, stochastic or heuristically guided search-based techniques [20,14] are often faster than semi-formal techniques and have the potential to explore a larger search space, but usually, end up producing relatively larger tests to meet similar goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PACOST [8] uses a formal model to generate an onion-ring guidance model for simulation. In [9] a data-mining based approach to learn supported by NSF grant 1422054 about cross cycle transitions which are used to guide the test generation towards specified target states. However, all these methods utilize macro level code coverage metrics, such as branch coverage, which do not adequately represent lower level behavior within the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%