2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24214-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction and Epistemic Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, we might consider adding further consistent formulations of BLV to V imp , in order to recover real analysis starting from the extension of all natural numbers -see, e.g., [Hale 2005] or [Panza 2016]. But see also [Boccuni & Panza 2021] for a critical view of this strategy, and an alternative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we might consider adding further consistent formulations of BLV to V imp , in order to recover real analysis starting from the extension of all natural numbers -see, e.g., [Hale 2005] or [Panza 2016]. But see also [Boccuni & Panza 2021] for a critical view of this strategy, and an alternative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, if this distinction were admitted, this argument should allow to conclude also that our definition of real numbers is no more analytic in the same sense in which neologicists take their definition of natural numbers to be so.53 We leave here apart the question of whether the neologicist definition of natural numbers or our definition of the E ⊘ -abstracta are actually logical or analytical. InPanza (2016), pp. 420-423, the point is made that the former definition might be deemed so in a quite peculiar sense, quite different than those that are current in the discussion on logicism and neologism, and because of a completely different argument than the neologicist's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%