2016
DOI: 10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.wp332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract WP332: Updating the Structure of Stroke Clinical Research Data: Version 2 of the Stroke Common Data Elements From the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Abstract: Introduction: In order to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of neurovascular clinical research studies, increase data quality, facilitate data sharing, help educate new clinical investigators and reduce study start-up time, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) convened a Working Group (WG) that developed Version 1.0 (published 2010) Stroke-specific Common Data Elements (CDEs). Since their initial publication, intervening advances in science and initial experie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary efficacy end point was recurrent ischemic stroke: an acute neurologic deficit, presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either symptoms persisting 24 hours or longer or symptoms persisting less than 24 hours but associated with neuroimaging findings of a new neuroanatomically relevant infarct. 26,27 The secondary efficacy outcomes were (1) recurrent PFOassociated ischemic stroke (recurrent ischemic strokes adjudicated as not being attributable to another mechanism by investigators of the individual trials); (2) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke or early (periprocedural or equivalent medical therapy time frame) all-cause mortality; (3) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, early all-cause mortality, or any vascular death; (4) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or vascular death; (5) disability-worsening recurrent ischemic stroke; and (6) any recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary efficacy end point was recurrent ischemic stroke: an acute neurologic deficit, presumed to be due to focal ischemia, and either symptoms persisting 24 hours or longer or symptoms persisting less than 24 hours but associated with neuroimaging findings of a new neuroanatomically relevant infarct. 26,27 The secondary efficacy outcomes were (1) recurrent PFOassociated ischemic stroke (recurrent ischemic strokes adjudicated as not being attributable to another mechanism by investigators of the individual trials); (2) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke or early (periprocedural or equivalent medical therapy time frame) all-cause mortality; (3) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, early all-cause mortality, or any vascular death; (4) the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or vascular death; (5) disability-worsening recurrent ischemic stroke; and (6) any recurrent stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perinatal intracerebral hemorrhage is defined within the National Institutes of Health Common Data Elements as a term neonate with encephalopathy, seizures, altered mental status, and/or neurological deficit within the first 28 days of life with a focal collection of blood within the brain parenchyma confirmed by neuroimaging or autopsy. 2 This is distinct from intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants, where germinal matrix hemorrhages are common. 3 The definition does not address overlapping hemorrhages (intraventricular and subarachnoid), does not capture nongerminal matrix hemorrhages in the fetus, and excludes presentation beyond the neonatal period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As agreed across all Working Groups of the Curing Coma Campaign CDE initiative, new CDEs were assigned, by consensus opinion within each WG, to one of four categories, in line with the previous NINDS CDE initiatives [13][14][15][16][17]. The designation of "disease core" was used to indicate CDEs which are required to be collected for all DoC studies.…”
Section: Cde Classi Cationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite vigorous research, there is a notable absence of well-de ned common data elements (CDE) for DoC [12], unlike interventions in other elds such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, among others [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%