2018
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-08-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract P4-08-03: EA2Clin: A novel immunohistochemical prognostic and predictive test for patients with estrogen receptor-Positive breast cancer

Abstract: Background: The majority of patients with early-stage estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) are treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after primary surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence. A variety of tests are available to predict outcomes on ET but most require gene-level measurements and are expensive. Recently, we developed an immunohistochemistry (IHC) based test (EA2Clin) using levels of pre-treatment IL6ST together with clinical variables and on-treatment proliferation. The aim wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, EA2 (but not EA2clin) was shown to accurately predict outcome from adjuvant ET in both postmenopausal ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.016 for RFS and BCSS, respectively) and premenopausal women ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.016 for RFS and BCSS, respectively). EA2clin showed the best performance in postmenopausal patients, outperforming both EA2 and NPI and accurately predicting outcome ( p < 0.001 for both RFS and BCSS) regardless of the type of adjuvant ET received [ 53 ].…”
Section: Molecular Signatures Incorporating Il6stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, EA2 (but not EA2clin) was shown to accurately predict outcome from adjuvant ET in both postmenopausal ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.016 for RFS and BCSS, respectively) and premenopausal women ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.016 for RFS and BCSS, respectively). EA2clin showed the best performance in postmenopausal patients, outperforming both EA2 and NPI and accurately predicting outcome ( p < 0.001 for both RFS and BCSS) regardless of the type of adjuvant ET received [ 53 ].…”
Section: Molecular Signatures Incorporating Il6stmentioning
confidence: 99%