2019
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-09-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract P1-09-04: Association between a breast cancer polygenic risk score and contralateral breast cancer risk

Abstract: Background Breast cancer patients are at significant risk of a second contralateral, breast cancer (CBC). Identification of women at high or low CBC risk could improve patient management decisions. Previous research has shown that breast cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) summarized in a polygenic risk score (PRS) predict the risk of a first breast cancer with an odds ratio (OR) per 1 SD of 1.55 (95% confidence interval (95%CI)=1.52-1.58) (77-SNP PRS). The aim of this study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to women who scored at the 50th percentile, the odds ratios were 0.75 and 1.33 for those in the 10th percentile and 90th percentile, respectively. 27 The authors did not calculate the actuarial risk of contralateral breast cancer in this case-control study, but if we assume a 25-year risk of 10%, then the great majority of women would fall within three percentage points of this mean. It is yet to be shown that providing a PRS for contralateral breast cancer will influence a woman's surgical decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to women who scored at the 50th percentile, the odds ratios were 0.75 and 1.33 for those in the 10th percentile and 90th percentile, respectively. 27 The authors did not calculate the actuarial risk of contralateral breast cancer in this case-control study, but if we assume a 25-year risk of 10%, then the great majority of women would fall within three percentage points of this mean. It is yet to be shown that providing a PRS for contralateral breast cancer will influence a woman's surgical decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…SEER also does not capture information on commonly occurring single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have been reported to influence the risk for contralateral breast cancer. 26,27 In a large case-control study conducted by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Kramer et al reported on the impact of a personal risk score (PRS) based on 313 SNPs on the relative risk of developing metachronous contralateral breast cancer. Compared to women who scored at the 50th percentile, the odds ratios were 0.75 and 1.33 for those in the 10th percentile and 90th percentile, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously described, adjustment for type of array was not needed because of the high correlation of PRS 313 between the two platforms. 12,13 All participants provided written informed consent, and all studies were approved by the relevant institutional review boards. BCAC data were centrally harmonized and cleaned in consultation with the study data managers and principal investigators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 PRS 313 is also associated with a higher risk of contralateral breast cancer with a HR per SD of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.33). 13 PRS for subtypespecific disease (estrogen receptor [ER]-positive and ER-negative disease) have also been established, although currently the risk prediction for ER-positive disease is better than for ER-negative disease. 7,12 One of the most promising clinical applications for PRS is to provide a personalized risk assessment to individualize breast cancer screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among women with breast cancer in the general population is estimated to be 0.5% per year, 1,2 with germline mutation status, race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, and menopausal status significantly influencing the risk. [3][4][5][6] Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 are detected in 5%-7% of women with breast cancer in the general population and are associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer in unaffected women. [7][8][9][10] The CBC risk among carriers of germline PVs, especially for ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 PV carriers, is not well-defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%